Their everlasting and unchanging laws Reproached thine ignorance. Awhile thou stoodst The merciful, and the avenging God! High in heaven's realm, upon a golden throne, Even like an earthly king; and whose dread work, Of fate, whom he created, in his sport, Earth heard the name; earth trembled, as the smoke Sworn in his dreadful name, rung through the land; Felt cold in her torn entrails! Religion! thou wert then in manhood's prime: That still consumed thy being, even when Thou heardst the step of fate; that flames might light Of parents dying on the pile that burned Even on the bed of death! But now contempt is mocking the grey hairs; Whose pride is passing by like thine, and sheds, That knows no term, cessation, or decay; Guides the fierce whirlwind, in the tempest roars, The place each spring of its machine shall fill; Heaven's lightenings scorch the uprooted ocean-fords, Whilst, to the eye of shipwrecked mariner, *Two instances will serve to render more sensible to us the principle here laid down; we will borrow one from natural the other from moral philosophy. In a whirlwind of dust raised by an impetuous wind, however confused it may appear to our eyes; in the most dreadful tempest excited by opposing winds, which convulse the waves, there is not a single particle of dust and water that is placed by chance, that has not its sufficient cause for occupying the situation in which it is, and which does not rigorously act in the mode it should act. A geometrician who knew equally the different powers which operate in both cases, and the properties of the particles which are propelled, would shew that according to the given causes, each particle acts precisely as it should act, and cannot act otherwise than it does. In those terrible convulsions which sometimes agitate political societies, and which frequently bring on the overthrow of an empire, there is not a single action, a single word, a single thought, a single volition, a single passion in the agents, which concur in the revolution as destroyers, or as victims, which is not necessary, which does not act as it should act, which does not infalliby produce the effects which it should produce, according to the place occupied by these agents in the moral whirlwind. This would appear evident to an intelligence which would be in a state to seize and appreciate all the actions and re-actions of the minds and bodies of those who contribute to this revolution. System of Nature, vol. i. A vague and unnecessitated task, Or acts but as it must aud ought to act. That in an April sun-beams's fleeting glows, We feel, but cannot see. Spirit of Nature! all-sufficing Power, *He who asserts the doctrine of Necessity, means that, contemplating the events which compose the moral and material universe, he beholds only an immense and uninterrupted chain of causes and effects, no one of which could occupy any other place than it does occupy, or act in any other place than it does act. The idea of necessity is obtained by our experience of the connection between objects, the uniformity of the operations Unlike the God of human error, thou Requires no prayers or praises; the caprice of nature, the constant conjunction of similar events, and the consequent inference of one from the other. Mankind are therefore agreed in the admission of necessity, if they admit that these two circumstances take place in voluntary action. Motive is, to voluntary action in the human mind, what cause is to effect in the material universe. The word liberty, as applied to mind, is analogus to the word chance, as applied to matter; they spring from an ignorance of the certainty of the conjunction of antecedents and consequents. Every human being is irresistibly impelled to act precisely as he does not ; in the eternity which preceded his birth, a chain of causes, was generated, which, operating under the name of motives, make it impossible that any thought of his mind, or any action of his life, should be otherwise than it is. Were the doctrine of Necessity false, the human mind would no longer be a legitimate object of science; from like causes it would be in vain that we should expect like effects; the strongest motive would no longer be paramount over the conduct; all knowledge would be vague and undeterminate; we could not predict with any certainty, that we might not meet as an enemy to morrow, him with whom we have parted in friendship tonight; the most probable inducements and the clearest reasonings would lose the invariable influence they possess. The contrary of this is demonstrably the fact. Similar circumstances produce the same unvariable effects. The precise character and motives of any man on any occasion being given, the moral philosopher could predict his actions with as much certainty as the natural philosopher could predict the effects of the mixture of any particular chemical substances. Why is the aged husband more experienced than the younger |