Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 38U.S. Department of Labor, Employees' Compensation Appeals Board., 1986 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 1
... Board U.S. Department of Labor Employees ' Compensation Appeals Board October 1 , 1986 - September 30 , 1987 Index Digest Supplement XIV to Volume 38 OF STATES WE UNITED ST OF LABOR AMERICA R.V Page Arm injuries .......... Attendant's ...
... Board U.S. Department of Labor Employees ' Compensation Appeals Board October 1 , 1986 - September 30 , 1987 Index Digest Supplement XIV to Volume 38 OF STATES WE UNITED ST OF LABOR AMERICA R.V Page Arm injuries .......... Attendant's ...
Strana 8
... Board . Patricia Brazzell , 38 ECAB 299 [ 1986 ] . The Board found that the Office had improperly terminated appellant's authoriza- tion for medical benefits as the medical evidence did not establish that she no longer had any residual ...
... Board . Patricia Brazzell , 38 ECAB 299 [ 1986 ] . The Board found that the Office had improperly terminated appellant's authoriza- tion for medical benefits as the medical evidence did not establish that she no longer had any residual ...
Strana 21
... Board found that the employing establishment's failure to comply with section 8151 ( b ) ( 2 ) did not fall within the coverage of the Act . Section 8151 ( b ) ( 2 ) cannot be considered a " requirement imposed by the employment " since ...
... Board found that the employing establishment's failure to comply with section 8151 ( b ) ( 2 ) did not fall within the coverage of the Act . Section 8151 ( b ) ( 2 ) cannot be considered a " requirement imposed by the employment " since ...
Strana 28
... Board found that since appellant had filed reports for the period March 1 , 1968 to January 20 , 1978 and the Office did not demonstrate that appellant " knowingly omitted " or understated earnings , no forfeiture could be declared for ...
... Board found that since appellant had filed reports for the period March 1 , 1968 to January 20 , 1978 and the Office did not demonstrate that appellant " knowingly omitted " or understated earnings , no forfeiture could be declared for ...
Strana 39
... Board found that the Office's action in requesting appellant to undergo testing to determine whether his disability contin- ued to be causally related to his employment and the extent of his disability was reasonable and did not ...
... Board found that the Office's action in requesting appellant to undergo testing to determine whether his disability contin- ued to be causally related to his employment and the extent of his disability was reasonable and did not ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
1985 appellant 1986 the Office 32 ECAB A.M.A. Guides accepted facts alleged Appellant requested appellant submitted appellant's appellant's claim April April 15 August 15 August 20 Board finds Board notes causally related claimant Compensation Act compensation benefits compensation order dated condition conflict of medical December December 17 decision dated diagnosed Docket ECAB employee's employing establishment employment injury evaluation examination February February 27 Federal Employees indicated that appellant January January 20 July July 24 June June 18 June 25 lant lant's letter dated March March 16 medical adviser reviewed medical evidence medical opinion ment MICHELE VON KELSCH November October Office hearing representative Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office's opined pain pellant percent impairment period permanent impairment physician pulmonary remanded report dated report Dr schedule award September 24 specialist statement of accepted sustained THOMAS The issue tion total disability U.S. POSTAL SERVICE U.S.C. section WILLIE T.C. THOMAS x-rays