What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 35
... Bolling, and Brown II Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I) Bolling v. Sharpe Brown v. Board of Education (Brown II) Appendix B: The Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions Brown v. Board of Education: A ...
... Bolling concerned racial discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the Fourteenth Amendment applied to the states, racial segregation by the federal government in the District of Columbia violated the Due ...
... Bolling, and Brown II for comparison. I am grateful to many colleagues and friends for their help in putting this volume together. First and foremost I would like to thank the contributors themselves for being willing to play along with ...
... (Bolling v. Sharpe). The Court heard them together because each raised the issue of the constitutionality of racially segregated public schools, albeit with slightly different facts and circumstances. In fact, Thurgood Marshall, the main ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |