What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 82
... these, usually called Brown I, was decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided ix.
... Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided the same day, was Bolling v. Sharpe. While Brown concerned the states, Bolling concerned racial discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the Fourteenth ...
... Fourteenth Amendment wanted only limited equality for blacks. That is one reason why a Fifteenth Amendment, explicitly granting blacks the right to vote, was thought necessary. Many of the contributors to this volume have distinctive ...
... Fourteenth Amendment forbids States to use their governmental powers to bar children on racial grounds from attending schools where there is state participation through any arrangement, management, funds or property.”23 Within a decade ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |