What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 19
... Jim Crow, actually represented the plaintiffs in the South Carolina case, Briggs v. Elliott. The District of Columbia case, Bolling v. Sharpe,2 was treated separately from the others because it raised distinct issues about the federal ...
... Jim Crow, which was given official sanction in the 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson.10 Nevertheless, eventually the country redeemed itself once again by overturning that unjust precedent and firmly establishing the principle of ...
... Jim Crow, and over the course of the next few decades, state legislatures throughout the South passed laws effectively disenfranchising blacks and mandating segregation of schools, churches, drinking fountains, places 10 part i.
... Jim Crow did not mean that there were no problems of inequality there. After all, the official title of Brown as Icon 11.
... Jim Crow and of Plessy to have been state classification of persons based on race. Hence whenever the state classifies by race, it risks returning to the racial division of society that characterized Jim Crow. According to the ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |