What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 60
... Law Schools in January of 2000, where the nine of us assumed the roles of a mock Supreme Court. The rules were quite simple. Each person was asked to write an opinion using only materials available as of May 17, 1954, when the first ...
... Education. Yet when it was first decided, many critics thought that Brown was inconsistent with sound principles of constitutional interpretation. Herbert Wechsler of Columbia Law School famously argued in 1959 that he could not come up ...
... ' “personal political and social ideas for the established law of the land.” This proved to be one of the more moderate reactions. Although congressional leaders pledged to “use all lawful means to bring about the 4 part i II.
... school districts receive the same quality of education as students in wealthier, largely allwhite suburban districts.21 Although these suburban districts seem as healthy as ever, the public school ... law schools. Thus, in 1956, the Court ...
... law school.43 Rather than taking the lead on the issue, the Court had deferred, ordering the integration of the University of Texas law school on the grounds that the separate law school for blacks was not substantially equal. By ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |