What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 62
... S. Days III (concurring) 92 • Bruce Ackerman (concurring) 100 • Frank I. Michelman (concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) 124 • John Hart Ely (concurring in the judgment ... Supreme Court's Original Opinions in Brown I, vii.
... Supreme Court's Original Opinions in Brown I, Bolling, and Brown II Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I) Bolling v. Sharpe Brown v. Board of Education (Brown II) Appendix B: The Constitution of the United States of America: Selected ...
... Supreme Court. The rules were quite simple. Each person was asked to write an opinion using only materials available as of May 17, 1954, when the first opinion in Brown was handed down. The opinion could be structured as a majority ...
... Supreme Court of the United States handed down one of its most famous opinions—Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.1 The case called Brown was actually a collection of five cases, from Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton), Kansas ...
... Supreme Court's corpus. The civil rights policy of the United States in the last half century has been premised on the correctness of Brown, even if people often disagree (and disagree heatedly) about what the opinion stands for. No ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |