What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 35
... argued in 1959 that he could not come up with a neutral principle to justify the result in the case. Critics of the philosophy of original intention have pointed to Brown as a counterexample, arguing that the framers and ratifiers of ...
... argued that Louisiana's regulation was a reasonable one, “consistent with the established usages, customs and traditions of the people, and with a view to the promotion of their comfort, and the preservation of the public peace and good ...
... argued that “[i]n view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates ...
... argued that these social and economic regulations violated freedom of contract and went beyond the limited powers of the federal government. The Court's attitude was symbolized by two famous cases: Lochner v. New York, which struck down ...
... argued that because courts—and particularly the U.S. Supreme Court—are isolated from day-to-day political struggle, they can preserve and defend principles and policies that are in the long-term interest of the country whether or not ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |