What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 60
... arguments or predictions about the future they wanted. Although the opinions were to be written as of 1954, a few anachronisms remain. In 1954 the polite term for African Americans was “Negro.” Some contributors retained that expression ...
... arguing that the framers and ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment wanted only limited equality for blacks. That is one reason why a Fifteenth Amendment, explicitly granting blacks the right to vote, was thought necessary. Many of the ...
... arguing that its overruling of previous precedents was abrupt and unexplained and that its use of social science to demonstrate the harm that segregation imposed on black children was unconvincing. The day after the decision, May 18 ...
... argument that increased spending on education could be justified in order to remedy reduced achievement by students ... arguing that the theory that black children suffer psychological harms from segregation “rest[ed] on an assumption of ...
... and professional programs under the authority of Brown I. Indeed, the Supreme Court actually distinguished Brown II, arguing that the latter opinion, “which contemplates some delay in the desegregation of public elementary 8 part i.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |