What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 87
The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision Jack M. Balkin. Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided the same day, was Bolling v. Sharpe. While Brown concerned the ...
... citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among ... civil rights movement. Much of Martin Luther King's rhetoric, for example, combines both elements. In his famous “I ...
The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision Jack M. Balkin. placement of legislative prerogatives was antidemocratic, and, as Alexander Bickel would put it, the Supreme Court was a “countermajoritarian ...
... civil rights law could help solve many other social problems. Yet over the next half century, some would become disenchanted with the claims of a special role for the courts, others with the ability of courts to effect lasting social ...
... civil rights plank in 1948, and that same year ordered the desegregation of the armed forces. He was willing to stake his presidency on support for civil rights. In retrospect, Truman's actions seem much more courageous than the Court's ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |