What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 56
... desegregation or a law review article written in 1996, although they were free to make any arguments or predictions about the future they wanted. Although the opinions were to be written as of 1954, a few anachronisms remain. In 1954 ...
... desegregate their schools “with all deliberate speed.” I asked the participants to draft an opinion that addressed the ... desegregation that occurred first in the South and later in the North. The goal is not to come up with the magic ...
... desegregation order in Arkansas. Yet, by the close of the twentieth century, Brown had achieved a special place of honor. One reason for that special status is that Brown fits nicely into a widely held and often repeated story about ...
... desegregation, but by the end of the twentieth century many public schools in the United States remained largely ... desegregation has slowed since the middle of the 1970s, due in part to Supreme Court decisions that made it very ...
... desegregation orders even if other aspects had never been fully complied with. And in the 1995 case of Missouri v. Jenkins,17 the Supreme Court overturned an ambitious plan for magnet schools in Kansas City designed to attract white ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |