What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 41
... Discrimination in education—Law and legislation— United States—History. I. Title: What Brown versus Board of Education should have said. II. Balkin, J. M. III. Ackerman, Bruce A. KF228.B76 W48 2001 344.73'0798—dc21 2001001735 New York ...
... discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the Fourteenth Amendment applied to the states, racial segregation by the federal government in the District of Columbia violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth ...
... discrimination in employment.27 By 1964 Justice Goldberg could state confidently that Brown “affirmed the right of all Americans to public equality.” The case stood for the general proposition that “the Fourteenth Amendment commands ...
... discrimination and help minorities gain greater opportunities in education and employment, they are acting consistent with the spirit of Brown, because the real goal of Brown was genuine educational opportunity. The meaning of Brown and ...
... discrimination in the United States remains a source of constant embarrassment to this Government in the day-to-day conduct of its foreign relations; and it jeopardizes the effective maintenance of our moral leadership of the free and ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |