What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 26
... harm that segregation imposed on black children was unconvincing. The day after the decision, May 18, 1954, James Reston wrote in the New York Times that the Court had rejected “history, philosophy, and custom” in basing its decision in ...
... harms from segregation “rest[ed] on an assumption of black inferiority.”18 The Supreme Court's decisions have accelerated the federal courts' drive to end existing desegregation orders. In other cases school districts have remained ...
... harms to schoolchildren that flowed from them, the Supreme Court followed Brown I with a series of unsigned (per curiam, literally “by the court”) orders affirming lower court decisions involving municipal golf courses, public buses ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |