What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 33
... litigation, etc.—History. 2. Topeka (Kan.). Board of Education—Trials, litigation, etc.—History. 3. Segregation in education—Law and legislation—United States— History. 4. Discrimination in education—Law and legislation— United States ...
... Litigation 29 3 Rewriting Brown: A Guide to the Opinions 44 part ii: Revised Opinions in Brown v. Board of Education • Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court) 77 • Drew S. Days III (concurring) 92 • Bruce Ackerman (concurring) 100 ...
... litigation, and explain the key issues that were at stake in the case. Part II features the contributors' revised opinions. Finally, as an appendix, I have included Chief Justice Warren's original opinions in Brown I, Bolling, and Brown ...
... litigation would impose new legal costs and subject them to renewed judicial scrutiny.19 Both of these trends have enhanced the tendency toward resegregation in the 1990s. Racial segregation today is the result of a complicated mix of ...
... litigation and constitutional interpretation had become for another the most prominent symbol of the futility of trying to change society through judicial constructions of constitutional law. The separation of right from remedy ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |