What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 67
... question: How would you have written the Brown opinion in 1954, if you knew then what you know now about the subsequent history of the country and the progress of race relations in the past half century? The results were staged at a ...
... question of what, if anything, courts could do to remedy segregation, and it held that states should desegregate their schools “with all deliberate speed.” I asked the participants to draft an opinion that addressed the legal issues ...
... question,” the Court explained, “that a State may not constitutionally require segregation of public facilities.”26 That same Term the Court cited Brown as prohibiting federal or state discrimination in employment.27 By 1964 Justice ...
... question is not whether law classifies by race, but whether the law—whatever its form—is working to remedy subordination or to enhance it. Moreover, because few legislatures these days are likely to make classifications directly ...
... question were the result of centuries of racial prejudice, and when blacks as a group were effectively denied the right to vote throughout much of the South. The country's democratic ideals required more than formal majority rule: they ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |