What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 80
... race relations in the United States and the role that courts play in promoting racial equality. For this book, I asked ... racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ...
... racial discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the Fourteenth Amendment applied to the states, racial segregation by the federal government in the District of Columbia violated the Due Process Clause of the ...
... Racial segregation today is the result of a complicated mix of social, political, legal, and economic factors, rather than the result of direct state commands ordering racial separation. Yet whatever the causes, it remains ...
... race schools do not necessarily violate the Constitution, and that the only concern of the courts should be whether schools have deliberately classified students by race ... segregation on small children, it quickly extended the case to ...
... racial grounds from attending schools where there is state participation ... segregation of public facilities.”26 That same Term the Court cited Brown as ... racial segregation by law is inequality.”28 Eventually, as these words suggest ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |