What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 49
... reason, it is also a book about the modern law of race relations in the United States and the role that courts play in promoting racial equality. For this book, I asked a group of distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the ...
... reason why a Fifteenth Amendment, explicitly granting blacks the right to vote, was thought necessary. Many of the contributors to this volume have distinctive theories about constitutional theory and constitutional interpretation ...
... reason for that special status is that Brown fits nicely into a widely held and often repeated story about America and its Constitution. This story has such deep resonance in American culture that we may justly regard it as the ...
... reasons for its orders; it simply summarily affirmed (or reversed) the decisions below. As a result many legal scholars criticized the per curiam opinions as an inappropriate exercise of judicial review.25 Nevertheless, the per curiam ...
... reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.”29 With these words, the Supreme Court gave its official blessing to Jim Crow, and over the course of the next few ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |