What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 49
... require separate but equal facilities in public elementary and secondary schools. Although the Court based its opinion in Brown I in part on the effects of segregation on small children, it quickly extended the case to graduate and ...
... require segregation of public facilities.”26 That same Term the Court cited Brown as prohibiting federal or state discrimination in employment.27 By 1964 Justice Goldberg could state confidently that Brown “affirmed the right of all ...
... requiring school segregation or had laws actually prohibiting it.50 Thus, instead of a decision by a fearless Supreme Court standing up to an entrenched and powerful majority, it is also possible to see Brown as part of a general ...
... . The 1964 Civil Rights Act threatened to cut off funds to schools that discriminated on the basis of race, and after a slow start, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare eventually decided to require complete 22 part i.
... require complete desegregation as a condition of federal funds under Title VI of the act.59 In 1965 Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which changed the balance of power in southern politics and led local officials in the South to ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |