What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 75
... School Board of Prince Edward County), and the District of Columbia (Bolling v. Sharpe). The Court heard them together because each raised the issue of the constitutionality of racially segregated public schools, albeit with slightly ...
... school districts and fewer still attended public schools. Nevertheless, desegregation actually increased a bit during the 1980s, even though the Reagan Administration repeatedly tried to persuade courts to scale back their intervention ...
... school desegregation orders even if other aspects had never been fully complied with. And in the 1995 case of Missouri ... school districts have remained technically subject to court orders but now face virtually no enforcement activity ...
... school districts receive the same quality of education as students in wealthier, largely allwhite suburban districts.21 Although these suburban districts seem as healthy as ever, the public school system in many urban areas is on the ...
... school segregation was largely a southern phenomenon. Segregation laws were concentrated in the seventeen southern and border states (plus the District of Columbia), although four states—including Kansas—permitted local choice on school ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |