What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 70
... school desegregation or a law review article written in 1996, although they were free to make any arguments or ... segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second ...
... Education Today In many respects the honor Brown has received is ironic. Brown was a case about public school desegregation, but by the end of the twentieth century many public schools in the United States remained largely segregated by ...
... segregation “rest[ed] on an assumption of black inferiority.”18 The Supreme Court's decisions have accelerated the federal courts' drive to end existing desegregation orders. In other cases school districts have remained technically ...
... schools. Although the Court based its opinion in Brown I in part on the effects of segregation on small children, it quickly extended the case to graduate and professional schools. This was hardly surprising. Supreme Court cases ...
... school desegregation in particular had been singled out for hostile foreign ... segregation and American constitutional rights were inconsistent with each ... school segregation was largely a southern phenomenon. Segregation laws were ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |