What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 23
... southern senators and congressmen issued a “Southern Manifesto” denouncing Brown as a “clear abuse of judicial power” that substituted the Justices' “personal political and social ideas for the established law of the land.” This proved ...
... southern phenomenon. Segregation laws were concentrated in the seventeen southern and border states (plus the District of Columbia), although four states—including Kansas—permitted local choice on school segregation. Twenty-seven states ...
... southern schools.52 Brown should also be read together with the Court's criminal procedure opinions, like Gideon v. Wainwright,53 which guaranteed the right to an attorney, and Miranda v. Arizona, which constrained police interrogation ...
... southern politics and led local officials in the South to take desegregation efforts much more seriously. By 1970, blacks were an important element of the Democratic coalition and “had substantial influence on the development of ...
... Southern Manifesto). 10. 163 U.S. 537 (1896). 11. See Gary A. Orfield, Mark D. Bachmeier, David R. James, and Tamela Eitle, “Deepening Segregation in American Public Schools,” Harvard Project on School Desegregation (April 5, 1997); ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |