What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin NYU Press, 1. 8. 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 30
... usually called Brown I, was decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided ix.
... violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. A third opinion, usually called Brown II, was decided on May 31, 1955. It concerned the very thorny question of what, if anything, courts could do to remedy segregation, and it ...
... violate the Constitution, and that the only concern of the courts should be whether schools have deliberately classified students by race. The effective compromise reached in the United States at the close of the twentieth century is ...
... violate the spirit of Brown because they bestow benefits through classifying individuals according to their race. Supporters of affirmative action argue, to the contrary, that Brown stands for the proposition that government may not ...
... violated freedom of contract and went beyond the limited powers of the federal government. The Court's attitude was symbolized by two famous cases: Lochner v. New York, which struck down a sixty-hour maximum work week for the baking ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |