American Law Reports Annotated, Svazek 146Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1943 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-3 z 87
Strana 549
... embezzlement . There must be lawful possession in the de- fendant at the time of the conversion to constitute embezzlement . The dis- tinguishing feature of embezzlement is that the taking essential to larceny is not required , a breach ...
... embezzlement . There must be lawful possession in the de- fendant at the time of the conversion to constitute embezzlement . The dis- tinguishing feature of embezzlement is that the taking essential to larceny is not required , a breach ...
Strana 594
... embezzlement are stated supra , IV d 3 and IV d 4 . VI . Summary and comment . The early English embezzlement statutes were of extremely limited scope , being expressly designed not to infringe upon the field of operation of common ...
... embezzlement are stated supra , IV d 3 and IV d 4 . VI . Summary and comment . The early English embezzlement statutes were of extremely limited scope , being expressly designed not to infringe upon the field of operation of common ...
Strana 1524
... embezzlement , distinction between , as affected by time of for- mation of felonious intent . 549 . 5. By husband or wife . Annotation- 146- Larceny and embezzlement , distinction between . 146–532 . § 6. By employee . Annotation ...
... embezzlement , distinction between , as affected by time of for- mation of felonious intent . 549 . 5. By husband or wife . Annotation- 146- Larceny and embezzlement , distinction between . 146–532 . § 6. By employee . Annotation ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accident accused action affirmed Amendment amount annotation appeared applied appropriation assistance attorney authority award bonds cause charge claim commission common compensation conclusion condition constitutional construction contract conviction counsel court death decision defendant denied determine effect embezzlement employee evidence ex rel existing express fact Federal findings findings of fact funds give ground guilty habeas corpus held holding income Industrial infra injuries insurance company interest involved issue judgment jury L ed larceny limitation matter meaning ment municipal necessary Okla operation opinion party payment person pointed possession prisoner question reason received relating relief rule safety saying sentence sion specific statute sufficient supra SW 2d taking testify testimony tion trial United violation witness writ