 a legal presumption that public and responsible officers, claiming " and exercising the right of disposing of the public domain, did it by " the order and consent of the Government, in whose name the acts  OPENIGN ARGUMENT - Strana 25autor/autoři: ARCHIBALD C. PEACHY - 1860Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Alabama. Supreme Court, George Noble Stewart, Benjamin Faneuil Porter - 1837 - 516 str.
...of land claims, he said, " it \vasa legal presumption that public and responsible officers chaining and exercising the right of disposing of the public domain, did it by order and consent of the government in whose name ihe acts were done; that otherwise the confusion... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court, Benjamin Faneuil Porter - 1840 - 816 str.
...held to operate as an estoppel. The Mayor, &c. of Mobile vs. Eslava. Again: it has been held to be a legal presumption, "that public and responsible...the government, in whose name the acts were done/' And consequently, grants by them of the public lands, " by color or claim of public authority, are... | |
 | 1855 - 804 str.
...which prevails as to all public grants of land, or acts of public officers in issuing warrants, &c., is, that the public acts of public officers, purporting...given, or subsequently ratified, which is equivalent." It is a universal principle, where power or jurisdiction " is delegated to any public officer or tribunal,... | |
 | Daniel Gardner - 1860 - 740 str.
...purporting to be exercised in any official capacity and by public authority, shall not be presumed to be an usurped, but a legitimate authority, previously given...right of disposing of the public domain, did it by order and consent of the government in whose name the acts were done, the confusion and uncertainty... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1841 - 688 str.
...of the United States v. Arredondo,(l) the Supreme Court of the United States held this language. " If it was not a legal presumption, that public and responsible officers claiming and exercising the (1) 6 Peters 727. McConnell ». Wilcox. right of disposing of the public domain, did it by the order... | |
 | Andrés Castillero - 1861 - 1066 str.
...purporting to be exercised in an official capacity, and by public authority, are not to be presumed to be usurped, but a legitimate authority previously given or subsequently ratified, which is equivalent." —The United States vs. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 728. 2. The Colonization Law of 1824, while it enjoined... | |
 | Henry Norris Copp - 1875 - 1000 str.
...held, in United States v. Arredondo, (6 Peters, p, 727,) " that the public acts of public officer3 purporting to be exercised in an official capacity...given, or subsequently ratified, which is equivalent;" and in United States v. Ciarle, (8 Peters, 451,) and Delassus v. United States, (9 Peters, 134,) that... | |
 | 1888 - 1462 str.
...to be exercised in* an official capacity and by public authority, shall not'be presumed to be an» usurped but a legitimate authority, previously given...If it was not a legal presumption that public and reeponsible officers, claiming and exercising the right of disposing of the public domain, did it by... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 974 str.
...purporting to be exercised in an official capacity, and by public authority, are not to be presumed to be usurped, but a legitimate authority previously given or subsequently ratified, which is equivalent." The United States v. Arredondo. 0 Pet., 728. 2. The Colonization Law of 1824, while it enjoined upon... | |
 | 1886 - 844 str.
...centuries, in its legitimacy, mut>t be held to operate as an estoppel. Again: It has been held to be a legal presumption, "that public and responsible...the government in whose name the acts were done." And consequently grants by them of the public lands, " by color or claim of public authority, are evidence... | |
| |
