Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub
[ocr errors]

many changes at Rome, Vefpafian, without waiting for further orders, refolved, in the year 69, to lay fiege to Jerufalem. In the mean time, Vefpafian, Vitellius being ftill alive, was proclaimed emperor by the legions of the eat; and, though he for fome time refufed to accept the dignity intended to be conferred upon him, he at length acquiefced; and it was then agreed that his fon Titus should continue the war against the Hebrews.

Geffius Florus, the procurator of Judea, had by his injuftice and extortion reduced that rich country to a miferable condition; and, adding cruelty to rapine, was the principal caufe of the Hebrews attempting to shake off the Roman yoke. Being declared rebels, they began to commit every kind of iniquity. All Judea was di vided into factions; a number of falfe prophets arofe; and the whole country was filled with nothing but murder and robbery. The Romans employed the feverest punishment to reduce these people to obedience, but ftill without effect. Having attacked Ceftius Gallus, the governor of Syria, they obliged him to retire; and this fuccess inspired them with fresh hopes and courage. The flames of war being thus kindled in Judea, Nero en-where he arrived amid the acclamatrufted the management of it to his tions of the populace, in the year 70 general Vefpafian, who, accompanied of the Chriftian æra. by his fon Titus, and a powerful army, arrived in Syria in the year 67 of the Christian æra.

Vefpafian began his warlike operations in the province of Galilee, which he reduced under the power of the Roman arms; and Flavius Jofephus, the celebrated hiftorian, and author of the Antiquities and Wars of the Jews, commanded then in Jotapa, a city of that province, where he was taken prifoner. He was, however, afterward fet at liberty by Titus, and efpoufed the cause of the Romans under that prince. Vefpafian having with equal fuccefs made himself master of Judea, and of every place in it except Jerufalem, he was preparing to lay fiege to that city; but hearing in the mean time, that Nero was dead, he thought proper to wait for the orders of his fucceffor Galba. With this view, he sent his fon Titus to Rome in the year 68, to learn the intentions of the new emperor: but Titus, when at Corinth, learning that Galba alfo was dead, and that Otho had mounted the throne, returned to Syria.

Otho was fucceeded by Vitellius; but as these short reigns had occafioned

[ocr errors]

Vefpafian, while at Alexandria in Egypt, was foon after acknowledged as emperor by common confent even at Rome. Finding his election confirmed, he fent orders to his fon Titus to continue the war against the Hebrews, and fet out for Rome,

Jerufalem at this time was torn by different contending factions, and a prey to all the miferies of a civil war within its own walls. Nothing was feen throughout the whole city but flaughter, tumult, and murder, while patriotifm was made a pretence for committing every fpecies of atrocity. Among these factions, the most violent was that of the zealots, thus called because they declared themfelves the defenders of the laws and religion: but in this they were actuated more by audacity than knowledge; and were in fact enemies instead of being friends to their country. The leaders of these factions were John of Gifcala, Simon fon of Joras, and Eleazer: but the latter being overcome by John, they were reduced to two.

In this miferable ftate was the city of Jerufalem, and all Judea, when, on the 14th of April, in the year 70, Titus undertook the fiege of the former, having encamped at the diftance of seven stadia, or about a mile from it. This happened at the time of the paffover, when the city was crowded with people, who had af、 fembled in order to celebrate that

[ocr errors]

festival,

festival, and on this account the confufion became the greater, and provifions foon began to fail.

A combat having taken place within the temple, between fome of the factions which prevailed in the city, a number of people were flaughtered; and the animofity of the citizens was increased. Famine began now to add to the horrors of war; and the Romans taking advantage of this difafter, and of the internal discord and confufion of the inhabitants, advanced their works nearer to the walls.

On the 4th of May, Titus made himfelf master of the first wall of Jerufalem, and caufed a great part of it toward the north to be demolished. Notwithstanding this fuccefs, he offered very favourable terms to the befieged, if they would fubmit; but this offer was rejected. Five days after, he took the second wall, from which he was, however, repulfed; but in four days more he again got it into his poffeffion, and demolished what remained of it in the northern quarter. Having failed in his attempt to batter down the third wall, Titus made new proposals to the Hebrews through the medium of Flavius Jofephus, who, after having received his liberty, as before mentioned, had attached himself to the Romans, and was with Titus in his encampment. The greater part of the people were inclined to accept the eafy conditions propofed to them by Jofephus in the name of the emperor: but being oppofed by John of Gifcala, and Simon the fon of Joras, the leaders of the zealots, Jofephus was treated with every mark of indignity and reproach.

After this behaviour their remained no more mercy for the Hebrews. Titus caufed the hands of thofe even who had voluntarily fought thelter in the Roman camp to be cut off, and

fent them back to the city, and others were crucified in the fight of their countrymen.

About the 30th of May, John of Gifcala and Simon the fon of Joras, made feveral fallies with so much vigour and refolution,. that many of the Romans began to confider Jerufalem as impregnable. Titus then drew a wall round the city thirty-nine stadia in extent, forming a circumference of four miles and feven-eighths. In this manner was Jerufalem fhut up entirely by the Romans, verifying what Jefus Chrift had predicted to the Jews, when he told them that their city would be enclosed by the enemy, and confined on every fide *.

Famine in the mean time began to make dreadful havock among the people. Of this calamity, and the diftreffes it occafioned, Jofephus gives fuch a pathetic account as cannot fail of exciting horror. He tells us, that the effects of hunger were fo great, that a noble lady, called Mary, devoured the flesh of her own fon; and that this action appeared fo unnatural to Titus, that he fwore he would bury the remembrance of it under the ruins of Jerufalem. We are informed alfo, that Titus, finding that all the miseries to which the city was expofed, were the confequences of the obftinacy and impiety of the Hebrews, lifted up his hands to heaven, and called God to witness that he was not the author of thofe misfortunes. These indeed were principally owing to the leaders of the different factions, who feem to have been the minifters of the divine vengeance against that infatuated nation, who would neither liften to the voice of God, communicated to them through the mouths of the prophets, nor acknowledge the Meffias fent to fave mankind, whom they treated with indignity, and at last put to death on the crofs.

*For the days fhall come upon thee, that thine enemies thall caft a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every fide, and fhall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they fhall not leave in thee one .ftone upon another: because thou kneweft not the time of the vifitation. Luke, chap. -x. ver. 43.44.

Titus, in order to haften the capture of the city, caufed all the trees which were within the distance of fome miles from Jerufalem, to be cut down, and employed them in his machines and military works. Having made every neceffary difpofition for continuing his operations with vigour, he applied his battering rams to the third wall, that is to fay, the wall enclofing the fortrefs, and made himself mafter of the tower called Antonia. The Romans being defirous to get poffeffion of the temple, without deftroying it, were obliged to fuftain a fierce confict in it: but a foldier, inftigated by fome unknown motive, threw a burning torch into the northern part of it, where there was a great quantity of combustible materials, by which means it was fet on fire. This magnificent building, therefore, was reduced to afhes, and the Hebrews, with great grief and forrow, faw a monument deftroyed, which was the principal object that had animated their hopes, and awakened their courage.

The zealots, though they now found that every advantage was on the fide of the Romans, ftill had the audacity to refift, and to oppose the arms of the conquerors. They firft took fhelter in the royal palace, which abounded with riches of every kind; but being driven thence, they retired to the upper part of Mount Sion. Here, however, they were obliged to fubmit; and John of Gifcala, with Simon the fon of Joras, their leaders, were taken prisoners. Simon was conducted to Rome, and ferved to ornament the triumph of Titus, after which he was put to death; and John was condemned to perpetual imprison

ment.

In short, on the 2d of September, in the year 71 of the Chriftian æra, and the fecond of the reign of Vefpafian, the city of Jerufalem fell entirely into the hands of Titus. It was then given up to be plundered by the foldiers, and most of its inhabitants were put to the sword. According to the orders of Titus, the

[ocr errors]

city was deftroyed to its foundations; and even the ruins of the temple were totally demolifted. Nothing was left ftanding but three of the higheft towers, that is to fay, Phafaelus, Ippicus and Mariamne, and that part of 'the wall which enclofed it on the well, in order that a garrifon might be placed there; and that from thefe remains, pofterity might fee what kind of a fortrefs the Romans had taken. Such devaftation took place in the reft of the city, that ftrangers, who paffed that way, could fcarcely have believed that it ever had been inhabited. When Titus entered Jerufalem, and beheld its ftrength, on account of its lofty and fingular towers, he confefied that he had not taken it by his own valour and conduct, but by the affiftance of God. The author who gives us this information fays alfo, that the number of prifoners taken during the whole time of the war was ninety-feven thoufand, and that the number killed in the city during the fame period amounted to eleven hundred thoufand.

We have feen in the third chapter that Jerufalem was never more than thirty-three ftadia, or four miles and an eighth, in circumference, That it could not be greater, is clearly proved by the extent of the wall drawn by Titus around it, which was only thirty-nine ftadia, or four miles and feven-eighths. The fpace, therefore, which remained for the Roman foldiers to carry on their operations, between the wall of Titus and that of the city, taking it at the utmost, contained three ftadia. As we may then conclude that Jerufalem could not be much above four miles in circumference, it appears that the number of thofe who perished in the city during the time of the fiege is greatly exaggerated; for it is not poffible that fo many people could be contained within fo narrow limits. The feftival of the paffover, which happened at that time, and which brought to Jerufalem the greater part of the people of judea, might no doubt have much augmented

[ocr errors]

augmented the ordinary number of the inhabitants; but ftill, when we confider the moderate fize of the city, we have every reason to conclude that the account given of this matter by Jofephus has in it more of the wonderful than the credible. Cornelius Tacitus, who lived in the first century, in the time of Vefpafian and Titus, heard it reported, that the number of the befieged, including thofe of every age and fex, was only fix hundred thousand.

Juftus Lipfius, a writer of the fixteenth century, in his commentary on Tacitus, feems inclined to think that the account of Jofephus is agreeable to truth; but as his opinion is not fupported by any convincing proofs, I ihall not enter into a difcuffion of it.

Eufebius Pamphilus, a writer of the fourth century, fays in his hiftory, that the number of those destroyed by Titus, in the fiege of Jerufalem, was fix hundred thousand,

Paulus Orofius, an hiftorian of the fifth century, adopts the opinion of Tacitus, but with the difference which is found in some of the editions of that author; for, according to Orofius, it was the number of thofe killed, and not of thofe befieged, which amounted to fix hundred thousand: but this may be an error of fome tranferibers. Befide Tacitus, Paulus Orofius quotes alfo Suetonius, who fays that the number of the Jews flain in that war was fix hundred thousand. This account, notwithstanding the difference between Tacitus and Orofius, appears a little more credible than that of Jofephus. Orofius, in relating the number of the killed, as handed down to us by that hiftorian, seems to infinuate, that it may have been exaggerated out of compliment to the emperor Vefpafian, with whom Jofephus was in great favour. When the city of Jotapa fell into the hands of that prince, and Jofephus was taken prifoner, he affured the conqueror that he would be raised to the

imperial throne of Rome. This prediction having been accomplished, Jofephus was fet at liberty. He af terward accompanied Titus to the fiege of Jerufalem, and from thence went with him to Rome, where Vefpafian made him a Roman citizen, and treated him with every mark of friendship. The emperor aligned him the houfe to live in which he himself had inhabited before he was elevated to that dignity, together with an annual penfion; and he rose into fo, much efteem, that he was even honoured with a statue.

While he refided at Rome he wrote his Hiftory of the Jewish War, in seven books. In this work it may be plainly feen that he flattered Vefpafian and Titus, but particularly the latter, by the relation he gives of the events of the fiege, and of the capture of Jerufalem, which is entirely deftitute of that fimplicity requifite in an historical narrative. When finished he prefented it to the emperor, and his fon Titus; the latter of whom, in order to fhew his efteem for it, figned it with his own hand, and caused it to be depofited in the public library. But to return to the flaughter of the Hebrews: whatever may have been the number killed, it is certain that a great many were destroyed, and many taken prifoners.

With the taking of the city ended the empire of the Hebrews, who, afthis period, were difperfed over the face of the earth, and became objects of univerfal contempt: thus proving the effects of their own impious imprecation, when they faid to Pilate, who declared that he found Jefus Chrift innocent, His blood be on us, and on our children *?

When Titus returned to Rome he had the honour of a triumph, together with Vefpafian; he received alfo the title of Cæfar; and a triumphal arch was erected to him, which still subfifts. When he triumphed, a golden table and golden candlestick, together

* Matthew, chap. xxvii. ver. 25.

with

[ocr errors]

with abundance of rich veffels, were carried before him; and in the last place, among the noble spoil, came the Book of the Law of the Hebrews. Vefpafian, unwilling to retain any of the riches taken from these people, caufed a temple to be erected in Rome,

to the goddess of Peace, and fent thither all the plunder, except the Book of the Law, and the purple veil of the holy place, which he was defirous might be depofited in the palace *.

A Defcription of the Defert of the HOLY CITY of JERUSALEM, with an Account of the Origin of Monaftic Inftitutions.

[From the SAM E.]

THE
'HE Defert of the Holy City is
fo denominated, on account of
its vicinity to Jerufalem, It lies, for
the most part, on the eastern fide of
Jerufalem, and extended as far as the
Dead Sea, being bounded on the
north by the brook Kedron, for about
the space of fix or feven miles. On
the fouth it had as boundaries the
city of Tekoa, with its defert; from
which, proceeding in a straight line
toward the Dead Sea, it compre-
hended a space of about four hundred
fquare miles; though the Chriftians
of that neighbourhood feem to have
confidered it in a more enlarged view,
and to have extended it as far as the
city of Jericho and the river Jordan.

It was in the fourth century that Palestine began to be inhabited by monks; and St. Hilarion is confidered there as the firft founder of monaftic inftitutions.

There were two perfect orders of ancient monks, viz. Cenobites and Anchorets. The cenobites were those who lived together in fociety, in one place, called on that account Cenobium. The anchorets, on the other hand, lived feparately in caverns and grottos, among the mountains; fubject, however, to a fuperior, who refided in another grotto where there was a church.

The fpace occupied by thefe anchorets was called Laura, from the name of a river, or rather rivulet, in the Defert of the Holy City, the grottos near which were those first in

habited by the monks after t. Hilarion. This word was afterward employed to diftinguish thofe places where the monks led a cenobitic life, from thofe where they refided as anchorets.

No monk, if he was young, and without a beard, was permitted by the fuperiors of the monafteries in Palestine to enter any laura; and thofe who wished to lead a folitary life were first obliged to pafs fome time in a cenobium. When admitted among the anchorets, it was necessary for them to endeavour to render themfelves more perfect by prayer and penitence; and, when not engaged in their religious duties, they were employed in weaving mats, making fmall baskets, and cultivating the earth.

From the lives of the holy fathers it appears, that befide the difference between the laura and the cenobium, there was a difference also between these and a monaftery, which fome have confidered only as a place inhabited by monks, who, poffeffed of certain powers, prefided over those who lived a folitary life. Others, however, have been of opinion, that a cenobium and a monastery are the fame: but this is certainly a mistake, as appears by the account of Calfianus.

Of both these places there were a great many in the Defert of the Holy City. The grottos which formed the retired habitations of the monks are,

Jofeph, de Bell. Jud. lib.vii. cap. 24.

fill

« PředchozíPokračovat »