Case and Comment, Svazek 93Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1988 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-3 z 79
Strana 39
... liability in the viaduct accident , affirmed the order of the Appellate Division holding that there was no liability with respect to the first bridge case , and reversed the order of the Appellate Division holding that there was no ...
... liability in the viaduct accident , affirmed the order of the Appellate Division holding that there was no liability with respect to the first bridge case , and reversed the order of the Appellate Division holding that there was no ...
Strana 40
... liability action is use of the product in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defend- ant ; and that , under both a negligence and a strict liability theory , the manufacturer had an obligation to anticipate reasonably ...
... liability action is use of the product in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defend- ant ; and that , under both a negligence and a strict liability theory , the manufacturer had an obligation to anticipate reasonably ...
Strana 52
... liability under statutes pe- nalizing abuse or neglect of the institutionalized infirm . Products liability : Electricity Pierce v Pacific Gas and Electric Company , 166 Cal App 3d 68 , 212 Cal Rptr 283 , CCH Prod Liab Rep ¶ 10509 , 41 ...
... liability under statutes pe- nalizing abuse or neglect of the institutionalized infirm . Products liability : Electricity Pierce v Pacific Gas and Electric Company , 166 Cal App 3d 68 , 212 Cal Rptr 283 , CCH Prod Liab Rep ¶ 10509 , 41 ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
86 ALR Fed accident action alleged ALR Fed covers ALR4th covers American Law Reports Appeals affirmed arbitration attorney award benefits circle Reader Service claim client Company Corpex Corporation cost counsel court held Court of Appeals covers the point damages death defendant deposition Dept Dictaphone discussing District Court documents employees ERISA evaluation evidence Expert testimony fact federal fees filed Hatch Act issue judge jurors jury law firm Lawyers Co-operative Publishing litigation malpractice ment motion negligence oxytocin P.O. Box parties pension peremptory challenges plaintiff practice presumption of innocence procedures products liability professional question Reader Service Card record remanded Rule 11 statute strict liability struck jury structured settlement suit summary judgment Supreme Court tion TOLL FREE tort Trademark trial court USCS VERALEX videotape violation voir dire York