 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1836 - 922 str.
...occasion with bona fides. A verdict having been returned for the plaintiff— £>'. />'. Harrison now moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was against the evidence, and that the testimony of the clerk had been improperly rejected.—The act of... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1841 - 662 str.
...mentioned in the evidence. Thomison they found not guilty. The defendants Ballard, Mitchell, and Hill, then moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence; that the court refused to permit the jury first to find as to Thomisou ; that the finding... | |
 | Otis Allen - 1845 - 506 str.
...jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, seven hundred and fifty dollars damages. The defendant now moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was against law and evidence, and the damages excessive. The facts as reported by Judge Brackenridge, were... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1859 - 738 str.
...the plaintiff must prove the contract as alleged. The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff; the defendant moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence and the charge of the Court; the motion was overruled, and the defendant appealed. It is insisted... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1846 - 628 str.
...immediately follows a similar statement, dated 30th June, 1843. , On the first day of July, the plaintiff moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence — verdict and judgnwnt contrary to law — and that improper evidence was intro* Thorn M.... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1853 - 926 str.
...Mitchell) severed, was tried on the plea of not guilty, convicted, and fined one hundred dollars. He moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, the law, and the instructions of the court. The court overruled the motion, and Mitchell... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1853 - 884 str.
...cause. The jury found a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, and assessed their damages at $1,140. Defendant moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was against the evidence, and that excessive damages were given by way of interest. The court overruled... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1895 - 830 str.
...amount, with interest from maturity to trial, and judgment being rendered on the verdict, defendant moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that the jury ignored the plea of usury, the court, by consent of parties, reduced... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1859 - 796 str.
...that the result of one should settle all. The jury found for the defendant, and counsel fer movant moved for a new trial, on the grounds, that the verdict was against law and evidence, and that the Court erred in its charge to the jury, that the order, with... | |
 | 1855 - 722 str.
...feel myself called on to express any opinion on their verdict." " RICHARD PENNEFATHEB." The defendants moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was against evidence, and against the weight of evidence, and also because a material witness for the defendants... | |
| |
Respondent moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence, that it was a compromise verdict, and that the damages allowed were inadequate. 
