Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 26The Board, 1974 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 4
... cause any disability after November 14 , 1960 and that his absence from work commencing April 28 , 1961 was not due to the injury , where 1961 examinations by PHS and employing establish- ment doctors revealed that he did not have any ...
... cause any disability after November 14 , 1960 and that his absence from work commencing April 28 , 1961 was not due to the injury , where 1961 examinations by PHS and employing establish- ment doctors revealed that he did not have any ...
Strana 5
... cause for appellant's complaints of aching sensa- tions in his leg . Dr. Hufnagel stated that appellant did not need ... caused recurrent pain , tingling and numb- ness in his right leg and that he was not able to walk normally on the ...
... cause for appellant's complaints of aching sensa- tions in his leg . Dr. Hufnagel stated that appellant did not need ... caused recurrent pain , tingling and numb- ness in his right leg and that he was not able to walk normally on the ...
Strana 6
... caused additional disability for work or a permanent partial impairment . It therefore refused to modify its decision of November 8 , 1961 . The Board finds that evidence establishes that the September 8 , 1960 injury did not cause any ...
... caused additional disability for work or a permanent partial impairment . It therefore refused to modify its decision of November 8 , 1961 . The Board finds that evidence establishes that the September 8 , 1960 injury did not cause any ...
Strana 9
... cause , sufficient cause not shown The test of whether a claimant has shown sufficient cause or reason is whether he prosecuted his claim with the degree of diligence an ordinarily prudent person would use in protecting his rights ...
... cause , sufficient cause not shown The test of whether a claimant has shown sufficient cause or reason is whether he prosecuted his claim with the degree of diligence an ordinarily prudent person would use in protecting his rights ...
Strana 10
... cause or reason in explanation of such failure . However , on the same date the Office advised him by letter that the evidence established that his hearing loss was causally related to his employment and that , although not entitled to ...
... cause or reason in explanation of such failure . However , on the same date the Office advised him by letter that the evidence established that his hearing loss was causally related to his employment and that , although not entitled to ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
1974 Before FLOYD 25 ECAB ANSLEY audiogram August aware begins to run binaural Board finds causally related claim for compensation Compensation Act compensation order dated December decibels decision Department determined disease dispensary Docket doctor duty employee's last exposure employing establishment employment injury established that appellant evaluation evidence establishes exposure to injurious failure to file February February 28 Federal Employees filed a claim FLOYD G FRED GERALD LAMBOLEY hereby affirmed Hospital January January 17 July June June 9 lant's limitations provisions loss of hearing loss of wage-earning March March 19 medical benefits medical evidence ment monaural Naval Shipyard Navy noise levels NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD notice of injury November October Office medical adviser Office of Workers opinion orthopedic surgeon otolaryngologist pain percent loss percent permanent loss received a schedule remanded report dated requested schedule award September statement STRINE The issue submitted sufficient cause surgery tion total disability U.S. POSTAL SERVICE wage-earning capacity