Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 26The Board, 1974 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 1
... period had not been decided by the Office and therefore was not reviewable by the Board . Docket No. 74-146 ; Submitted on the Record ; Issued July 26 , 1974 Before FLOYD G. ANSLEY , E. GERALD LAMBOLEY , FRED E. STRINE Appellant , a ...
... period had not been decided by the Office and therefore was not reviewable by the Board . Docket No. 74-146 ; Submitted on the Record ; Issued July 26 , 1974 Before FLOYD G. ANSLEY , E. GERALD LAMBOLEY , FRED E. STRINE Appellant , a ...
Strana 2
... period commencing October 11 , 1972 , has not been decided by the Office and therefore is not reviewable by the Board . 2 Therefore , the appeal is dismissed and the case record is re- turned to the Office of Workers ' Compensation ...
... period commencing October 11 , 1972 , has not been decided by the Office and therefore is not reviewable by the Board . 2 Therefore , the appeal is dismissed and the case record is re- turned to the Office of Workers ' Compensation ...
Strana 4
... period of his absence not covered by leave . On March 3 , 1961 , appellant was examined by Dr. O. Anderson Engh , a Board - certified orthopedic surgeon and Public Health Service consultant . He complained of pain in the right calf and ...
... period of his absence not covered by leave . On March 3 , 1961 , appellant was examined by Dr. O. Anderson Engh , a Board - certified orthopedic surgeon and Public Health Service consultant . He complained of pain in the right calf and ...
Strana 15
... periods of temporary disability and to medical benefits for any employment - related cond- tion . The compensation ... period of employment nor the belief of appellant that the disease was caused by employment conditions is sufficient ...
... periods of temporary disability and to medical benefits for any employment - related cond- tion . The compensation ... period of employment nor the belief of appellant that the disease was caused by employment conditions is sufficient ...
Strana 18
... period , the trip away from and back to the premises for the purpose of getting lunch is indistinguishable in principle from the trip at the beginning and end of the workday and is governed by the same rules and exceptions . Where ...
... period , the trip away from and back to the premises for the purpose of getting lunch is indistinguishable in principle from the trip at the beginning and end of the workday and is governed by the same rules and exceptions . Where ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
1974 Before FLOYD 25 ECAB ANSLEY audiogram August aware begins to run binaural Board finds causally related claim for compensation Compensation Act compensation order dated December decibels decision Department determined disease dispensary Docket doctor duty employee's last exposure employing establishment employment injury established that appellant evaluation evidence establishes exposure to injurious failure to file February February 28 Federal Employees filed a claim FLOYD G FRED GERALD LAMBOLEY hereby affirmed Hospital January January 17 July June June 9 lant's limitations provisions loss of hearing loss of wage-earning March March 19 medical benefits medical evidence ment monaural Naval Shipyard Navy noise levels NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD notice of injury November October Office medical adviser Office of Workers opinion orthopedic surgeon otolaryngologist pain percent loss percent permanent loss received a schedule remanded report dated requested schedule award September statement STRINE The issue submitted sufficient cause surgery tion total disability U.S. POSTAL SERVICE wage-earning capacity