Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 26The Board, 1974 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 93
Strana 5
... need treatment . The assistant medical director of the Office pointed out that the report from Dr. Salsbery did not show that appellant had any permanent impairment of the right leg . He noted that COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DECISIONS 5 LO.
... need treatment . The assistant medical director of the Office pointed out that the report from Dr. Salsbery did not show that appellant had any permanent impairment of the right leg . He noted that COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DECISIONS 5 LO.
Strana 38
... pointed out in its decision that the Board will not consider new evidence . Neverthe- less , the Office treated all of his letters as requests for reconsidera- tion with the exception of the one of March 6 , 1974 , which was identical ...
... pointed out in its decision that the Board will not consider new evidence . Neverthe- less , the Office treated all of his letters as requests for reconsidera- tion with the exception of the one of March 6 , 1974 , which was identical ...
Strana 45
... pointed out that treatment had consisted of vigorous thoracic exercises , Bufferin and moist heat . On December 6 , 1972 , the Office informed appellant that it had determined that his current condition was related to the June 1969 ...
... pointed out that treatment had consisted of vigorous thoracic exercises , Bufferin and moist heat . On December 6 , 1972 , the Office informed appellant that it had determined that his current condition was related to the June 1969 ...
Strana 46
... pointed out that follow- ing the June 1969 injury appellant did not lose any time from work until he was separated . The Office requested Dr. Joseph G. Burd , a Board - certified orthopedic surgeon , to examine appellant and the case ...
... pointed out that follow- ing the June 1969 injury appellant did not lose any time from work until he was separated . The Office requested Dr. Joseph G. Burd , a Board - certified orthopedic surgeon , to examine appellant and the case ...
Strana 47
... pointed out that there was a conflict in opinion among medical specialists as to whether appellant continued to have an employ- ment - related disability . He recommended that the Office " extend the benefit of doubt to the claimant and ...
... pointed out that there was a conflict in opinion among medical specialists as to whether appellant continued to have an employ- ment - related disability . He recommended that the Office " extend the benefit of doubt to the claimant and ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
1974 Before FLOYD 25 ECAB ANSLEY audiogram August aware begins to run binaural Board finds causally related claim for compensation Compensation Act compensation order dated December decibels decision Department determined disease dispensary Docket doctor duty employee's last exposure employing establishment employment injury established that appellant evaluation evidence establishes exposure to injurious failure to file February February 28 Federal Employees filed a claim FLOYD G FRED GERALD LAMBOLEY hereby affirmed Hospital January January 17 July June June 9 lant's limitations provisions loss of hearing loss of wage-earning March March 19 medical benefits medical evidence ment monaural Naval Shipyard Navy noise levels NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD notice of injury November October Office medical adviser Office of Workers opinion orthopedic surgeon otolaryngologist pain percent loss percent permanent loss received a schedule remanded report dated requested schedule award September statement STRINE The issue submitted sufficient cause surgery tion total disability U.S. POSTAL SERVICE wage-earning capacity