Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 26The Board, 1974 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 97
Strana 9
... reason is whether he prosecuted his claim with the degree of diligence an ordinarily prudent person would use in protecting his rights . Where appellant knew for several years before his retirement that his noisy working environment was ...
... reason is whether he prosecuted his claim with the degree of diligence an ordinarily prudent person would use in protecting his rights . Where appellant knew for several years before his retirement that his noisy working environment was ...
Strana 10
... reason in explanation of such failure . However , on the same date the Office advised him by letter that the evidence established that his hearing loss was causally related to his employment and that , although not entitled to compensa ...
... reason in explanation of such failure . However , on the same date the Office advised him by letter that the evidence established that his hearing loss was causally related to his employment and that , although not entitled to compensa ...
Strana 11
... reason is whether he prosecuted his claim with the degree of diligence an ordinarily prudent person would use in protecting his rights . Since appellant knew for several years before his retire- ment that his noisy working environment ...
... reason is whether he prosecuted his claim with the degree of diligence an ordinarily prudent person would use in protecting his rights . Since appellant knew for several years before his retire- ment that his noisy working environment ...
Strana 19
... reason that " The evidence of record does not establish that [ appellant ] was in the performance of his duties at the time of the injury of December 3 , 1973. ” As a general rule , off - premises injuries sustained by employees having ...
... reason that " The evidence of record does not establish that [ appellant ] was in the performance of his duties at the time of the injury of December 3 , 1973. ” As a general rule , off - premises injuries sustained by employees having ...
Strana 24
... reasons that , " The fact of an injury sustained in the performance of duty is not estab- lished and the disability for which compensation is claimed is not causally related to the employment . " Appellant has the burden of establishing ...
... reasons that , " The fact of an injury sustained in the performance of duty is not estab- lished and the disability for which compensation is claimed is not causally related to the employment . " Appellant has the burden of establishing ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
1974 Before FLOYD 25 ECAB ANSLEY audiogram August aware begins to run binaural Board finds causally related claim for compensation Compensation Act compensation order dated December decibels decision Department determined disease dispensary Docket doctor duty employee's last exposure employing establishment employment injury established that appellant evaluation evidence establishes exposure to injurious failure to file February February 28 Federal Employees filed a claim FLOYD G FRED GERALD LAMBOLEY hereby affirmed Hospital January January 17 July June June 9 lant's limitations provisions loss of hearing loss of wage-earning March March 19 medical benefits medical evidence ment monaural Naval Shipyard Navy noise levels NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD notice of injury November October Office medical adviser Office of Workers opinion orthopedic surgeon otolaryngologist pain percent loss percent permanent loss received a schedule remanded report dated requested schedule award September statement STRINE The issue submitted sufficient cause surgery tion total disability U.S. POSTAL SERVICE wage-earning capacity