...identified. Bates v. Little Rock, 361 US 516; NAACP v. Alabama, 357 US 449, 462. The reason for those holdings was that identification and fear of reprisal...peaceful discussions of public matters of importance. This broad Los Angeles ordinance is subject to the same infirmity. We hold that it, like the Griffin,...

...identified. Bates v. Little Rock, 361 US 516; NAACP v. Alabama, 357 US 449, 462. The reason for those holdings was that identification and fear of reprisal...peaceful discussions of public matters of importance. This broad Los Angeles ordinance is subject to the same infirmity. We hold that it, like the Griffin,...

...identified. Bates v. Little Rock, 361 US 516; AT. AACP v. Alabama, 357 US 449, 462. The reason for those holdings was that identification and fear of reprisal...peaceful discussions of public matters of importance. This broad Los Angeles ordinance is subject to the same infirmity. We hold that it, like the Griffin,...

...nonconformists of one kind or another. As we said recently, the identification of members of groups and fear of reprisal "might deter perfectly peaceful discussions of public matters of importance." Talley v. California, 362 US 60, 65. There is, in my view, a disability on the part of government to...

...California, a statute prhibltlng distribution of anonymous handbills was held void on Its face because "identification and fear of reprisal might deter perfectly...peaceful discussions of public matters of importance." 362 US 60, 65 (1960). M iS'ee note 6 supra. In the Massachusetts case. In re Pappas, No. 14,690 (Mass....

...California, a statute inhibiting distribution of anonymous handbills was held void on its face because "Identification and fear of reprisal might deter perfectly...peaceful discussions of public matters of importance." 362 rS 60. 65 (1960). *.Sfe note 6 supra. In the Massachusetts case, In re Pappas, No. 14,690 (Mass....

...The Court then went on to emphasize the potential importance of anonymity in expression and concluded that "identification and fear of reprisal might deter...perfectly peaceful discussions of public matters of importance."1*2 The fourth category is that of registration of the press, with the concomitant infringement...

...The Court then went on to emphasize the potential importance of anonymity in expression and concluded that "identification and fear of reprisal might deter...perfectly peaceful discussions of public matters of importance."182 The fourth category is that of registration of the press, with the concomitant infringement...

...keep arms in privacy, that is, anonymously. On this question, two United States Supreme Court oases, at least, seem decisive. In a 1960 case, the Court...such delivery from .the Post Office on the grounds that : "[The addressees] must think they would invite disaster if they read what the Federal Government...

...simultaneously an interference with the freedom of its adherents." 82 complished against a known speaker,*3 "identification and fear of reprisal might deter perfectly...peaceful discussions of public matters of importance" (id. at 65). If the deterrence of speech by such disclosure may sometimes violate the First Amendment,...