 That all that part of the United States, west of the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and also, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not within any state to which...  The American Jurist - Strana 5261834Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | United States. Congress. House - 956 str.
...contains two distinct territories: first, all the country west of the Mississippi, <fcc.; secondly, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi,...which the Indian title has not been extinguished. If the fact neither occurred within the territories so described nor was perpetrated by any Indian... | |
 | Peter Force - 1835 - 404 str.
...Repreicntatiret of* the United Statei ofjlmenca, in Congreis auemblid. That nil that part of the United Stairs west of the Mississippi, and not within the States of Missouri and Loui.-iana, or the Territory of Arkansas, and, also, that part' of the United States east of the Mississippi... | |
 | Thomas Francis Gordon - 1837 - 886 str.
...or before the first of February next, a general report of all proceedings in the premises.(4) 1070. All that part of the United States west of the Mississippi,...and, also, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not within any slate to which the Indian title has not been extinguished, for... | |
 | 1839 - 397 str.
...That all that part of the United States west of the Mississippi, &c., * * * and also all that part east of the Mississippi, and not within any State...which the Indian title has not been extinguished, for the purposes of this act, be taken and deemed to be Indian.country. 13 "Si:c. 2. And be it further... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature - 1841 - 632 str.
...the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all that part of the United States, west of the Mississippi,...and also, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not within any state to which the Indian title has not been extinguished, for... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature - 1841 - 630 str.
...act to regulate Irade and intercourse with the Indian tribes, and to preserve peace on the frontiers. or the territory of Arkansas, and also, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not within any state to which the Indian title has not been extinguished, for... | |
 | United States - 1846 - 356 str.
...domed IB- and not withm the States of Missouri and Louisiana, or the east of the Mississippi river, and not within any state to which the Indian title has not been extinguished, for the purposes of this act, be taken and deemed to be the Indian country. i '1,1 i -.1 /* ji TT /•... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1867 - 460 str.
...States were within the region described as "the Indian country" in the first section of that law. viz: " all that part of the United States west of the Mississippi,...and also, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not within any State to which the Indian title has not been extinguished." •... | |
 | James Kent - 1854 - 684 str.
...and establishing a new Indian code. It provided that the part of the United States west of the river Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri...Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and also the part of the United States east of the Mississippi, and not within any state to which the Indian... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1862 - 964 str.
...Rio Grande. The Indian Territory defined in the act of 1834 (4 USL 739,) is thus described : "That all that part of the United States west of the Mississippi...and not within the States of Missouri and Louisiana and the Territory of Arkansas, and all that part of the United States cast of the Mississippi river... | |
| |
