...departments, the city denied the request. 8 In its report regarding the appli* Overton Park was described in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 406: "Overton Park is a 342-acre city park located near the center of Memphis. The park contains a...

...of review under the arbitrary and capricious standard (just quoted (5 USC § 706(2)(A)) is set forth in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 416 (1971), as follows: Section 706(2)(A) requires a finding that the actual choice made was not "arbitrary,...

...convincing evidence of a congressional intent that the administrative action not be subject to challenge. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 410 (1971). Or, in more positive terms: "Where . . . there is no express grant of review, reviewability...

...convincing evidence of a congressional intent that the administrative action not be subject to challenge. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 410 (1971). Or, in more positive terms: "Where . . . there is no express grant of review, reviewability...

...Court held that the Low-Rent Management Manual of HUD and subsequent HUD circulars were "mandatory." In Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 419 (1971), the Court held that a Department of Transportation order "constitutes the law in effect."...

...convincing evidence of a congressional intent that the administrative action not be subject to challenge. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe , 401 US 402, 410 (1971). Or, in more positive terms: "Where . . . there is no express grant of review, reviewability...

...convincing evidence of a congressional intent that the administrative action not be subject to challenge. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 410 (1971). Or, in more positive terms: "Where . . . there is no express grant of review, reviewability...

...applicable when a statute is "drawn in such broad terms that in a given case there is no law to apply." Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe. 401 US 402, 410 (1971 ). or where "the question is so wide open and at large" as to be best left to the judgment of...

...applicable when a statute is "drawn in such broad terms that in a given case there is no law to apply," Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 410 (1971), or where "the question is so wide open and at large" as to be best left to the judgment of...

...discretion by law." at a minimum, the right to judicial review of such action would be doubtful. See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402. 410, 91 S. Ct. 814, 820, 28 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1971). We do not reach this issue. In response to Louisiana's petition,...