| United States. District Court (Maine), Edward Henry Daveis - 1849 - 464 str.
...Peters, 25. And in still broader terms lie says, in the opinion before quoted, "Hence, of necessity, usages have been established in every department of...regulate the -rights and duties of those who act within respective limits ; and no change of those usages can have a retrospective effect, but must be limited... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1850 - 684 str.
...force in this argument : but no The United States v. Buchanan. change of a usage, even by authority, can have a retrospective effect, but must be limited to the future." And in answer to the sixth and fifteenth prayers for instruction, the learned judge charged the jury,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1854 - 536 str.
...the proper action of the government. Hence, of necessity, usages have been established in every part of the government, which have become a kind of common...must be limited to the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it, and must be considered binding on past transactions.... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate - 1857 - 878 str.
...consideration, cannot be denied. "Of necessity," say the court in the case of the United States vs. McDaniel, " usages have been established in every department of...must be limited to the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it, and must Ъе considered binding on past transactions."... | |
| Benjamin Robbins Curtis, United States. Supreme Court - 1864 - 652 str.
...anticipated nor defined, and which are essential to the proper action of the government. Hence, of necessity, usages have been established in every department of...be limited to' the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it, and must be considered binding on past transactions.... | |
| United States. Court of Claims - 1919 - 740 str.
...anticipated nor defined and which are essential to the proper action of the Government. Hence, of necessity, usages have been established in every department of...retrospective effect, but must be limited to the future." United States v. Macdaniel, 7 Pet., 1, 14. Aside from that rule it is plainly deducible from the terms... | |
| United States. Congress. House - 1881 - 868 str.
...denned, and which are essential to the proper action of the Government. Hence, of necessity, Mnges have been established in every department of the Government,...must be limited to the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it, and must be considered binding on past transactions."... | |
| United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1882 - 682 str.
...Goreriitnent which h'ave become a kind of common lair, and reijulatf the rights and duties of those tcho act within their respective limits. And no change...must be limited to the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it; and must be considered binding on past transactions."... | |
| United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1882 - 668 str.
...which have become a kind of common laic, and reynlatr the riglifn and duties of thane who act tcithin their respective limits. And no change of such usages...must be limited to the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it; and must be considered binding on past transactions."... | |
| United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1882 - 676 str.
...common ¡aw, and reyulati- the ri'jhln and duties of Ikone who act within their re«pectire limit«. And no change of such usages can have a retrospective...must be limited to the future. Usage cannot alter the law, but it is evidence of the construction given to it; and must be considered binding on past transactions."... | |
| |