 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1879 - 942 str.
...jurisdiction attached. (Porter v. Purdy, 29 NY (2 Tiffany), 111; Betts v. Bagley, 12 Pick. 672.) 3. When a court has jurisdiction it has a right to decide every question that arises in the cause. (Elliott v. Peirsol, 1 Peters, 340; 2 Peters, 169; Shawhan v. Loffer, 24... | |
 | Elijah Paine, United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1827 - 748 str.
...erroneous, that is, good and valid, until reversed, or void aad a nullity ab initio. Where a Court possesses jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question...judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding. But if it act without authority, its judgments are considered as nullities, and form no Jiar to a recovery... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Richard Peters - 1829 - 758 str.
...down. " We agree, that if the county court had jurisdiction, its decisions would be conclusive. When a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question that occurs in the cause ; and whether its decisions be correct or not, its judgment, until reversed,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1844 - 800 str.
...that their decisions are conclusive ; " it has a right to decide 'every question which occurs in a cause, and whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed, is binding on every other court." 1 Peters, 340. In Voorhees v. The Bank of the United States the same... | |
 | Samuel Owen - 1845 - 434 str.
...this principle been more emphatically laid down, than by the supreme court of the United States. " Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to...until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other court. But if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are... | |
 | 1845 - 490 str.
...this principle been more emphatically laid downrthan by the supreme court of the United States. " ' Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to...until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other court. But if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1845 - 852 str.
...it as if it had been pleaded. So in Fisher v. Harnden, 1 Paine, 58, Mr. Justice Livingston said, " Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question that occurs in the cause ; and, whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed,... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - 1848 - 786 str.
...the proceedings of the Superior Court. In Elliot vs. Pierson the Supreme Court decides, that "when a Court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question that arises in the cause; and whether the decision be correct or not, its judgment until reversed is... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1851 - 838 str.
...stated by this court in the case of Elliot et al. v. Peirsol et al., (1 Peters, 3-40,) in these words: ' Where a court has jurisdiction it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause ; ani whether its decision be correct or not, its judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1852 - 496 str.
...defendant's counsel. When a court has jurisdiction it has a right to decide any question which may arise in the cause, and whether its decision be correct...judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding in every every other court. But if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.... | |
| |
Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause ; and whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other court. But if it act without authority,... 
