 | 1917 - 510 str.
...government itself and that of the states. It would not be contend"'1 **"* exceptions, it is not percei\red that there is any limit to the questions which can be adjusted touching any matter which is proper!}' the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." These statements of Prof. Story and Justice... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1919 - 250 str.
...of the territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Ry. vs. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country, Ware vs. Hylton, (3. Dall.) 199; Chirac vs. Chirac, 15 US (2 Wheat.) 259; Houenstein vs. Lynham, 100... | |
 | 1890 - 1130 str.
...of the latter, without Ite consent. Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 U. S. 525, 541, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 995. But, with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Wure v. Hylton,3Dall. 199; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; HauenBtein v. Lynham, 100 US 483 ; 8 Ops.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 778 str.
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...matter which is properly the . -subject of negotiation Avith a foreign country. Ware v. I/ylton, 3 Ball. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; ffauenstein... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1890 - 784 str.
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 US 483 ; 8... | |
 | James Bradley Thayer - 1894 - 470 str.
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 5tl. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. H niton, 3 Dall. 199; Chirac v. Ch,rac, 2 Wheat 259; Hanensle,n v. Lynliam, 100 US 483; 8 Opinions... | |
 | Emlin McClain - 1900 - 1126 str.
...territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac r. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein r. Lynham, 100 US 483; 8... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - 1900 - 792 str.
...one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent. But with these exceptions it is not perceived that there is any limit to it touching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiations with a foreign country." My conclusion... | |
 | Emlin McClain - 1900 - 1134 str.
...territory of the latter without its consent. Fort I,,cavenworth Hailroad Co. r. Lowe, 114 US 525, 5+1. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that there is any limit to tho questions which can be adjusted tonching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiation... | |
 | 1901 - 1234 str.
...consent. (Fort Leavervworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US, 525, 541.) But with these exceptions, it is riot perceived that there is any limit to the questions...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." 6. THE CONCEDED POWEK TO ACQUIRE TERRITORY BY TREATY OR -BY CONQUEST, INCLUDES THE RIGHT TO PRESCRIBE... | |
| |
It would not be contended that it > extends so far as to authorize what the constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the states, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent. 
