 ... that this species of testimony supposes some better testimony which might be adduced in the particular case is not the sole ground of its exclusion. Its intrinsic weakness, its incompetency to satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the...  Reports of Civil and Criminal Cases Decided by the Court of Appeals of ... - Strana 707autor/autoři: Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, Alexander Keith Marshall, George Minos Bibb, William Littell - 1909Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Peyton Randolph, Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1827 - 776 str.
...incompetency to satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule, that hear-say evidence is totally inadmissible." To this rule, however, there are some few exceptions, which, the books tell us, are as old as the rule... | |
 | 1843 - 506 str.
...incompetency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds, which may be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule, that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible. It becomes, therefore, of great importance clearly to distinguish between hearsay, and what is deemed... | |
 | Esek Cowen, Nicholas Hill - 1839 - 906 str.
...weakness, ils incompetency to .satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practiced under its cover, combine to support the...rule that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible: thegenral rule supports the case ; and the case is not within any exception heretofore recognized.... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 764 str.
...satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which may be practised with impunity under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible (i). § 386. It cannot, however, be denied, that the rule excluding hearsay evidence,... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1849 - 814 str.
...tency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is totally insufficient« The principle of this rule ¡Si that such evidence requires credit to be given to a... | |
 | Theodore Thring - 1861 - 416 str.
...satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which may be practised with impunity under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible. 2 Kxceptiona There are, however, certain important exceptions, dfexciusioa. which it... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1866 - 756 str.
...mcompetency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which may be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule, that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible.2 § 100. Before we proceed any farther in the discussion of this branch of evidence,... | |
 | 1916 - 506 str.
...specific fact, which, in its nature, is susincompetency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact and the frauds which may be practiced under its...rule, that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible."* Notwithstanding such weakness and incompetency, yet we know that when we get away from effort "to establish... | |
 | Herbert Broom, Edward Alfred Hadley - 1875 - 858 str.
...weakness, its incompetency to satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practiced under its cover, combine to support the...rule that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible. MAKSIIATJ,, CJ, in Mima Queen v. Hepburn, 7 Cranch, 290, 296. See Ваш v. Wood, 1 Wheat. 6, 8. On... | |
 | Theodore Thring, Charles Edwin Gifford - 1877 - 584 str.
...as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which 1 2 Buss. 732. may be practised with impunity under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible.1 There are. however, certain important Exceptions i . -iii- to the rule exceptions, which... | |
| |
