 | United States. Congress. House - 574 str.
...purpose, and is not comprised in the general powers arid jurisdiction of the court. It is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a supreme court but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing s\\a\\ be intended... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, William Pyle Taunton - 1815 - 860 str.
...Dairies, 1 Ld. Raym. „/" 796., and Winford v. Powell, ibid. 1310., vis. that nothing shall MDNKLEY. be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction... | |
 | 1834 - 610 str.
...And .this is in accordance with the distinction, well settled in the books, and which is an important rule of pleading, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the juris1834.] Replevin of Goods taken in Execution. diction of a superior court, but what expressly appears... | |
 | Thomas Coventry, Samuel Hughes - 1832 - 672 str.
...has exceeded its own jurisdiction, unless it is apparent that it has done so. Aтm. 10 Mod. 71. 4. Nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; but, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction... | |
 | 1833 - 548 str.
...statute, as upon the authority of that well known and established legal maxim, in l Sand. (Wms.) 74 a, " that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court, but that which specially appears to be so." Mr. Justice Botanquet said, " The real question here is, hat there been... | |
 | 1834 - 612 str.
...And this is in accordance with the distinction; well settled in the books, and which is an important rule of pleading, that nothing shall be intended to...be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so, nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly... | |
 | John Frederick Archbold - 1838 - 682 str.
...inquiry. Ruddock v. Smith, 1 Dowl. 467. *CHAFTER VI. PLEAS TO THE JURISDICTION. IT is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1843 - 962 str.
...in Wales, county palatine of Chester, and the court of Ely — Pigye v. Gardner, 1 Lev. 208 : for, " nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so ; nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly... | |
| |
the rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so, and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court... 
