Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 55 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 86
Strana 19
There was no error in ruling out the evidence of Compton , as set forth in the record , or in rejecting the tax digest of the city , inasmuch as that evidence was not relevant to the issue on trial before the court .
There was no error in ruling out the evidence of Compton , as set forth in the record , or in rejecting the tax digest of the city , inasmuch as that evidence was not relevant to the issue on trial before the court .
Strana 23
But suppose he had been on the stand , and his evidence had been what the defendants did not expect , could these parties have claimed a continuance in the mere hope of obtaining contradictory testimony ? I can see no difference between ...
But suppose he had been on the stand , and his evidence had been what the defendants did not expect , could these parties have claimed a continuance in the mere hope of obtaining contradictory testimony ? I can see no difference between ...
Strana 24
“ If the documents mentioned in that paper were received by Arnold & DuBose , there was higher evidence of the fact , the testimony of the parties , and the person who signed the receipt was actually on the stand as a witness .
“ If the documents mentioned in that paper were received by Arnold & DuBose , there was higher evidence of the fact , the testimony of the parties , and the person who signed the receipt was actually on the stand as a witness .
Strana 28
... evidence of title , because he had notice at the time he purchased from the trustee , that the sale was not made as ... written evidence of title was fraudulent , within the true intent and meaning of the 2683d section of the Code .
... evidence of title , because he had notice at the time he purchased from the trustee , that the sale was not made as ... written evidence of title was fraudulent , within the true intent and meaning of the 2683d section of the Code .
Strana 45
There is parol evidence that the claimant bought in the early part of 1866 , but from whom is not stated . There is , in the record , a deed , introduced by the plaintiff in fi . fa . , dated in 1863 , from one Josephus Echols to the ...
There is parol evidence that the claimant bought in the early part of 1866 , but from whom is not stated . There is , in the record , a deed , introduced by the plaintiff in fi . fa . , dated in 1863 , from one Josephus Echols to the ...
Co říkají ostatní - Napsat recenzi
Na obvyklých místech jsme nenalezli žádné recenze.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action administrator affidavit affirmed agent agreed alleged allowed amend amount answer appears application authority Bank bill bond brought cause charge claim claimant Code Company complainant consideration contract cotton counsel creditor damages debt decision deed defendant in error dismissed entitled equity et al evidence excepted execution facts filed firm Georgia Reports given granted ground hands held hold homestead husband Ibid illegal indictment interest issue JACKSON Judge judgment jury Justice land letter levy lien matter ment mortgage motion notice objection opinion overruled paid party passed payment person plaintiff in error plea pleadings possession present principal proceeds purchase question reason received record refused rendered reversed rule sheriff sold statute sufficient suit Superior Court term thereof tion trial trust verdict wife witness
Bibliografické údaje
| Název | Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 55 |
| Autor | Georgia. Supreme Court |
| Vydavatel | Edward O. Jenkins, 1876 |
| Zdroj originálu: | Ohijská státní univerzita (MORITZ LAW LIBRARY) |
| Digitalizováno | 3. duben 2015 |
| Exportovat citaci | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |