Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 55 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 76
Strana 22
DuBose et al . grounds . The motion was overruled by the presiding ... I. “ The first
ground of the motion for a new trial , is the refusal of the court to continue the
case for want of the testimony of F. E. Smith . He was one of the tenants who
raised ...
DuBose et al . grounds . The motion was overruled by the presiding ... I. “ The first
ground of the motion for a new trial , is the refusal of the court to continue the
case for want of the testimony of F. E. Smith . He was one of the tenants who
raised ...
Strana 23
The second ground of the motion is the refusal of the court to strike out the
testimony of W. D. Smith as to the arrangements for the crop of 1871 , the crop of
1872 being the subject of litigation . There was evilence going to show that the ...
The second ground of the motion is the refusal of the court to strike out the
testimony of W. D. Smith as to the arrangements for the crop of 1871 , the crop of
1872 being the subject of litigation . There was evilence going to show that the ...
Strana 24
No other ground stated in the motion was urged in the argument , except the
eighth . I therefore dispose of the remaining grounds without comment . VIII . “
The eighth ground raises the question whether the minors in the case , were
estopped ...
No other ground stated in the motion was urged in the argument , except the
eighth . I therefore dispose of the remaining grounds without comment . VIII . “
The eighth ground raises the question whether the minors in the case , were
estopped ...
Strana 47
... ground of such challenge does not appear . Thompson vs. The State of
Georgia . 3. It was ATLANTA , JULY TERM , 1875 . 47.
... ground of such challenge does not appear . Thompson vs. The State of
Georgia . 3. It was ATLANTA , JULY TERM , 1875 . 47.
Strana 49
The court did not err in refusing to sustain the defendant's challenge to the array
of the jury put upon him at the trial , inasmuch as it does not appear what was the
ground of the challenge , whether it was a legal ground or otherwise . 3.
The court did not err in refusing to sustain the defendant's challenge to the array
of the jury put upon him at the trial , inasmuch as it does not appear what was the
ground of the challenge , whether it was a legal ground or otherwise . 3.
Co říkají ostatní - Napsat recenzi
Na obvyklých místech jsme nenalezli žádné recenze.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action administrator affidavit affirmed agent agreed alleged allowed amend amount answer appears application authority Bank bill bond brought cause charge claim claimant Code Company complainant consideration contract cotton counsel creditor damages debt decision deed defendant in error dismissed effect entitled equity et al evidence excepted execution facts filed firm Georgia Reports given granted ground hands held hold homestead Ibid illegal indictment interest issue JACKSON Judge judgment jury Justice land letter levy lien matter ment mortgage motion notice objection opinion overruled paid party passed payment person plaintiff in error plea pleadings possession present principal proceeds purchase question reason received record refused rendered reversed rule sheriff sold statute sufficient suit Superior Court term thereof tion trial trust verdict wife witness
Bibliografické údaje
| Titul | Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 55 |
| Autor | Georgia. Supreme Court |
| Vydavatel | Edward O. Jenkins, 1876 |
| Zdroj originálu: | Ohijská státní univerzita (MORITZ LAW LIBRARY) |
| Digitalizováno | 3. duben 2015 |
| Exportovat citaci | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |