...US, at 52. 928 OCTOBER TERM, 1981 Opinion of the Court 458 US "the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit...except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing1 imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Id., at 447. See...

...341 US 494, at 507 (1951). These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.2 As we. 2 It was on the theory that the Smith Act, 54 Stat. 670, 18 USC § 2385, embodied such...

...341 US 494, at 507 (1951). These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.2 As we Per Curiam. 395 US said in Noto v. United States, 367 US 290, 297-298 (1961), "the mere...

...US 444, 447 (1969), the Supreme Court, in a per curiam decision, noted that : [T]he Constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit...advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except when such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce...

...principle underlying the decisions of the last twenty years — that the First Amendment protects advocacy of law violation except "where such advocacy is directed...action and is likely to incite or produce such action." The carefully drawn words of the Convention requiring "direct and public incitement" are thus consistent...

...genocide and, as we and others have said before, incitement in the words of the Supreme Court, which "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless...action and is likely to incite or produce such action" is not protected by the Constitution. The Civil Liberties Union does not believe, that this convention...

...permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except when such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action. (Emphasis added.) 6 In conformity with these holdings, proscription of advocacy...

...Negroes and Jews. The Court set out the constitutional standard as follows: . . . the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit...inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is Ukely to incite or produce such action. (Emphasis added) ' And in a related area, the case of New York...

...Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444, a case involving criminal syndicalism, this Court ruled that a State may not "forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force...action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Id., at 447. The same idea was put in somewhat different words in Noto v. United States, 367 US 290,...

...The Court held that advocacy of violence or the joining with others to do so could not be proscribed "except where such advocacy is directed to inciting...action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Id., at 447. Clearly the New York questions are not nearly so narrowly drawn. New York seeks to inquire...