Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 81Edward O. Jenkins, 1889 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 78
Strana 1
... et al . vs. BARLOW 1. The declaration in the code that possession , to be the foundation of prescription , must not originate in fraud , means such fraud as is actual , moral fraud , as distinguished from legal fraud . Hunt et al . vs. Dunn ...
... et al . vs. BARLOW 1. The declaration in the code that possession , to be the foundation of prescription , must not originate in fraud , means such fraud as is actual , moral fraud , as distinguished from legal fraud . Hunt et al . vs. Dunn ...
Strana 9
Georgia. Supreme Court. Ware et al . vs. Barlow . concluded that two of these executors had a right to carry out the provisions of the will ? Would any court hold that he was guilty of such a ... et al . vs. Brown 81. ] 9 MARCH TERM , 1888 .
Georgia. Supreme Court. Ware et al . vs. Barlow . concluded that two of these executors had a right to carry out the provisions of the will ? Would any court hold that he was guilty of such a ... et al . vs. Brown 81. ] 9 MARCH TERM , 1888 .
Strana 10
Georgia. Supreme Court. Moore , Marsh & Company et al . vs. Brown et al . the superior outstanding title of James Lyle . That was a contest between two different titles . The defend- ant in that case had notice that the other title was ...
Georgia. Supreme Court. Moore , Marsh & Company et al . vs. Brown et al . the superior outstanding title of James Lyle . That was a contest between two different titles . The defend- ant in that case had notice that the other title was ...
Strana 11
Georgia. Supreme Court. Moore , Marsh & Company et al . vs. Brown et al . except as to paying out the fund , in respect to which he makes no contest . 3. Where the vital issue is fraud in certain mortgages , as the burden of proving ...
Georgia. Supreme Court. Moore , Marsh & Company et al . vs. Brown et al . except as to paying out the fund , in respect to which he makes no contest . 3. Where the vital issue is fraud in certain mortgages , as the burden of proving ...
Strana 12
Georgia. Supreme Court. cess . Moore , Marsh & Company et al . vs. Brown et al . counsel being in attendance for the plaintiffs in error . In the afternoon , Judge Vason moved to reinstate the case , and showed for cause that he was the ...
Georgia. Supreme Court. cess . Moore , Marsh & Company et al . vs. Brown et al . counsel being in attendance for the plaintiffs in error . In the afternoon , Judge Vason moved to reinstate the case , and showed for cause that he was the ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action agent alleged amendment amount Atlanta Atlantic Railroad Bartow county bill of lading BLECKLEY bond brought cars Central Railroad certiorari charge city court claim complained contract corporation cotton counsel court erred court of equity creditors damages debt deceased December 22 decision declaration deed defendant defendant's Edward Ware entitled evidence execution executor facts fendant filed fraud Georgia Railroad Gordon County granted ground guano husband Ibid illegal Johnson Judge Judgment affirmed jury Justice land levied liable ment mortgage motion negligence overruled paid parties person plaintiff in error plea pleaded possession purchase question Railroad and Banking Railroad Co Railroad Company received recover rent rule Savannah sell sheriff SIMMONS sold statute stockholders sued superior court surety sustained term testator testified testimony thereof tion trial trustee usury verdict Waycross Western & Atlantic Western and Atlantic wife Wikle witness