Reports of Cases in Law and Equity: Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, Svazek 81 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 69
Strana 51
There was evidence that the work of removing the props was carefully done , and
tending to show that the arch may have been badly constructed — that it lacked
rods binding it together , or else firmer abutments . O'Brien was shown to have ...
There was evidence that the work of removing the props was carefully done , and
tending to show that the arch may have been badly constructed — that it lacked
rods binding it together , or else firmer abutments . O'Brien was shown to have ...
Strana 52
The question is , whether the evidence made a prima facie case of negligence
against the corporation , -negligence in the performance of its legal duties to the
deceased carpenter . It is certain that to take the mason's opinion of the safety of ...
The question is , whether the evidence made a prima facie case of negligence
against the corporation , -negligence in the performance of its legal duties to the
deceased carpenter . It is certain that to take the mason's opinion of the safety of ...
Strana 53
This action could not be maintained on the evidence adduced by the plaintiff ' ;
and the judgment of the court granting the nonsuit was correct . The head - note
is a part of this opinion . Judgment affirmed . ANDREW vs. STEWART
BROTHERS ...
This action could not be maintained on the evidence adduced by the plaintiff ' ;
and the judgment of the court granting the nonsuit was correct . The head - note
is a part of this opinion . Judgment affirmed . ANDREW vs. STEWART
BROTHERS ...
Strana 71
The defendant moved for a new trial on the following grounds : ( 1 ) - ( 2 ) The
charge of the court was contrary to law and evidence . ( 3 ) Because the court
erred in charging the jury as follows : “ In this case , the defendant cannot recover
of ...
The defendant moved for a new trial on the following grounds : ( 1 ) - ( 2 ) The
charge of the court was contrary to law and evidence . ( 3 ) Because the court
erred in charging the jury as follows : “ In this case , the defendant cannot recover
of ...
Strana 78
Because the verdict was contrary to law , in that the suit and verdict are against
the Mayor and Council of the City of Gainesville . ” ” This has been considered . “
Because the verdict is contrary to evidence . ” We think that under the evidence ...
Because the verdict was contrary to law , in that the suit and verdict are against
the Mayor and Council of the City of Gainesville . ” ” This has been considered . “
Because the verdict is contrary to evidence . ” We think that under the evidence ...
Co říkají ostatní - Napsat recenzi
Na obvyklých místech jsme nenalezli žádné recenze.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action administrator admitted affirmed agent agreed alleged allowed amount appears applied Atlanta authority bank bill bond brought cars cause charge claim Company complained contract corporation counsel creditors damages death debt decision deed defendant deliver effect entered entitled et al evidence excepted execution executor facts filed fraud further Georgia give given granted ground hands held hold husband Ibid interest issue Judge judgment jury Justice land levied March matter motion notice paid parties person plaintiff in error plea possession present proper proved purchase question Railroad Railroad Company reason received record recover refused rendered Reported road rule sell sold sued sufficient suit superior court sustained term testified testimony tion tort trial trustee verdict whole wife witness
Bibliografické údaje
| Titul | Reports of Cases in Law and Equity: Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, Svazek 81 |
| Autor | Georgia. Supreme Court |
| Vydavatel | Edward O. Jenkins, 1889 |
| Zdroj originálu: | Cornellská univerzita |
| Digitalizováno | 26. červen 2014 |
| Exportovat citaci | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |