Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

241 U. S.

CITY OF HARTFORD. In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut. Argued April 12, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112, 160; Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361, 367–369; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598; Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., 233 U. S. 211, 218-219; O'Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 253; Mount Vernon Cotton Co. v. Alabama Power Co., 240 U. S. 30, 32. Mr. Edward H. Rogers, Mr. Birdsey E. Case and Mr. Edward D. Robbins for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edward M. Day and Mr. Alvan Waldo Hyde for the defendants in error.

No.. Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER Oof James J. GRIFFIN and GORDON M. PEACOCK, PETITIONERS. Submitted April 10, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus denied. Mr. Arthur E. Dowell for the petitioner.

No. 312. MARY MULCARE ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS, ETC., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Argued April 20, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22; Cincinnati Street Railway v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30, 35-37. Mr. Hiram T. Gilbert and Mr. John W. Walsh for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Chester E. Cleveland for the defendants in error.

No. 188. KANSAS CITY, MEXICO & ORIENT RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, 1. THE STATE of Texas.

241 U. S.

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas. Argued April 17 and 18, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of:

(1) Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487; Stearns v. Wood, 236 U. S.

75.

(2) Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396-399; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240.

(3) Henkel v. Cincinnati, 177 U. S. 170; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192, 194; Allen v. Arguimbau, 198 U. S. 149, 156; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 55.

(4) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471. See Pinney v. Nelson, 183 U. S. 144, 147; Abilene National Bank v. Dolley, 228 U. S. 1, 5; Lake Shore & Michigan So. Ry. v. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285, 289, et seq.; Cincinnati, Indianapolis & W. Ry. v. Connersville, 218 U. S. 336; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 283 et seq. Mr. Herbert S. Garrett, Mr. Robert Lynn Batts and Mr. John A. Eaton for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Benjamin F. Looney and Mr. Frank L. Snodgrass for the defendant in error.

No. 793. IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, APPELLANT, v. JAMES M. POWER, MARSHAL, ETC. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Argued April 24, 1916. Decided May 1, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508;

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

241 U. S

Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31. Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles Fox for the appellees.

No. 135, October term, 1914. WILSON CYPRESS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ENRIQUE DEL POZO Y MARCOS ET AL. Submitted April 24, 1916. Decided May 1, 1916. Motion for leave to file in the trial court a supplemental bill in the nature of a bill of review denied. Mr. William W. Dewhurst, Mr. Joseph H. Jones, and Mr. John C. Jones for the petitioners. Mr. John C. Cooper in opposition thereto.

No. 324. DANIEL A. LONG, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN E. SHEPARD. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted April 26, 1916. Decided May 8, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of National Foundry & Pipe Co. v. Oconto Water Works Supply Co., 183 U. S. 216, 237; Vandalia R. R. v. Indiana, 207 U. S. 359, 367; Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Ry., 224 U. S. 268, 270. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson and Mr. C. Dale Wolfe for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in

error.

Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF ELBERT R. ROBINSON, PETITIONER. Submitted April 28,

No.

[ocr errors]

241 U.S.

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

1916. Decided May 8, 1916. Motion for leave to file petition denied. Mr. George W. Ellis for the petitioner.

No. 189. ANNA C. DUNHAM ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CLARA V. KAUFFMAN ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Argued May 4, 1916. Decided May 22, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (2) The Pennsylvania College Cases, 13 Wall. 190; Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U. S. 561; Missouri Pacific Ry. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 274–275. (3) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471. Mr. D. K. Watson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles C. Pavey for the defendants in error.

No. 344. ROBERT D. KINNEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PLYMOUTH ROCK SQUAB COMPANY ET AL. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Argued by the plaintiff in error May 1, 1916. Decided May 22, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U. S. 477; Weir v. Rountree, 216 U. S. 607; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575. (2) Provident Savings Society v. Ford, 114 U. S. 635, 641-642; Metcalf v. Watertown, 128 U. S. 586, 588; Pope v. Louisville, New Albany &c. Ry., 173 U. S. 573, 580-581. See United States ex rel. Kinney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 222 U. S. 283;

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

241 U. S.

Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 236 U. S. 43. Mr. Robert D. Kinney pro se. No appearance for the defendants in error.

No. 333. THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DEFIANCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM A. KEHNAST ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Argued April 28 and May 1, 1916. Decided May 22, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Chemical National Bank v. City Bank of Portage, 160 U. S. 646; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134. (2) Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 778, 781; Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank, 134 U. S. 527; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U. S. 644; Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U. S. 107. Mr. Robert Newbegin and Mr. Henry Newbegin for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Tellis T. Shaw, Mr. Harold W. Fraser, Mr. Henry B. Harris and Mr. E. J. Marshall for the defendants in error.

No. 362. ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN H. MOUNTS. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Argued for plaintiff in error May 5, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment reversed with costs and cause remanded for further proceedings upon the authority of Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491; Missouri &c. Ry. v. Harriman, 227 U. S. 657; Atchison, Topeka &c. Ry. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173; Georgia, Florida &c. Ry. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 U. S. 190. Mr. R. A. Kleinschmidt, Mr. W. F. Evans and Mr. E. H. Foster for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error.

« PředchozíPokračovat »