Worthy et al. vs. Lowry.

Wyche et ux. vs. Green

Wyche vs. Myrick.

York vs. Clopton et al.

Wood vs. Coosa and Chat. Riv. R. R. Company
Worthy et al. vs. Johnson et al.

Wright vs. Georgia Railroad and Banking Company. 34th
Wright vs. Georgia Railroad and Banking Company. 34th
Wright vs. Georgia Railroad and Banking Company. 34th
Wright vs. Phillips.

51st

66

170

"6
32d

234

13th

32d

616

Wynn vs. Booker et al., executors

CERTIORARI. See Practice in Superior, City, and County Courts, 11,

13, 15.

CHARGE OF COURT.

1. Inapplicable to facts, charge should not be given. Wagner, guardian,
vs. Robinson, 47.

2. Charge that judgment attacked for fraud may be good in part though
fraudulently obtained as a whole, not damage party, if jury find no
fraud and sustain entire judgment. Sindall et al. vs. Thacker & Co.
et al., 51.

3. Aiding to escape, on trial of prosecution for, error to charge that custody
was legal if state's evidence is true, or that if jury believe such evi-
dence they must find verdict of guilty. Habersham vs. State, 61.
4. Requests which court designs to refuse, should not be read to jury,
Ransone vs. Christian, 351.

5. Nominal damages, law as to should be charged where any view of facts
proven justify such charge. Ibid.

6. Libel, declaration for alleged no special damage, and none proven, that
no recovery could be had therefor, should, on request, be charged.
Ibid.

7. Torts, different species of damages which jury may give in, not neces-
sary for court to go into elaborate explanation of, though requested.
A distinct application of controlling principles to the facts of the par-
ticular case is what the jury need. Ibid.