Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 56 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 83
Strana 12
This oft - repeated rule of this court should be more rigidly adhered to where the
case against the plaintiff in error is made out by the testimony of an impartial
witness , and his case supported only by his own evidence . 3. The fact that
plaintiff in ...
This oft - repeated rule of this court should be more rigidly adhered to where the
case against the plaintiff in error is made out by the testimony of an impartial
witness , and his case supported only by his own evidence . 3. The fact that
plaintiff in ...
Strana 13
Driver vs. Maxwell . a defective fence , of the cattle and hogs and the proof of the
landlord is that of a disinterested witness , fully sustaining the verdict of the jury ,
the verdict should stand for these , if all the other reasons given be untenable .
Driver vs. Maxwell . a defective fence , of the cattle and hogs and the proof of the
landlord is that of a disinterested witness , fully sustaining the verdict of the jury ,
the verdict should stand for these , if all the other reasons given be untenable .
Strana 24
The discretion of the court in refusing to allow leading questions on
crossexamination , will not be controlled unless abused ; especially where the
witness is one of the parties to the suit in whose interest the questions are
propounded . 2.
The discretion of the court in refusing to allow leading questions on
crossexamination , will not be controlled unless abused ; especially where the
witness is one of the parties to the suit in whose interest the questions are
propounded . 2.
Strana 27
The claimants ' counsel also proposed to ask the same witness , on his cross -
examination , the following question : “ Who was the owner of the cotton at the
time it was levied on ? ” The court refused to allow the questions to be answered
by ...
The claimants ' counsel also proposed to ask the same witness , on his cross -
examination , the following question : “ Who was the owner of the cotton at the
time it was levied on ? ” The court refused to allow the questions to be answered
by ...
Strana 29
He proved by his half - brother that this account of the matter was true , and four
or five witnesses testified to the prisoner's good character . There was no
evidence to the contrary of this , nor was the brother either impeached or
contradicted .
He proved by his half - brother that this account of the matter was true , and four
or five witnesses testified to the prisoner's good character . There was no
evidence to the contrary of this , nor was the brother either impeached or
contradicted .
Co říkají ostatní - Napsat recenzi
Na obvyklých místech jsme nenalezli žádné recenze.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action administrator affidavit affirmed agent alleged allowed amendment amount answer appear application assigned authority bank bill bond brought cause charge claim claimant Code Company complainant contract cotton counsel creditors damages debt decree deed defendant in error entitled equity et al evidence excepted execution executor facts favor filed Georgia Reports give given granted ground hands held hold Ibid injunction interest issue John Judge judgment jury land levy lien matter ment motion notice opinion ordinary paid parties passed payment person plaintiff in error plea pleaded possession present proved purchase question Railroad reason received record recover refused rendered rent reversed road rule sheriff sold statute sued suit Superior Court Term thereof tion trial trustee unless verdict whole wife witness
Bibliografické údaje
| Titul | Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 56 |
| Autor | Georgia. Supreme Court |
| Vydavatel | Edward O. Jenkins, 1877 |
| Zdroj originálu: | Cornellská univerzita |
| Digitalizováno | 21. listopad 2014 |
| Exportovat citaci | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |