 | John Dunton - 1707 - 588 str.
...Impnfonment, when fworn to do it according to the beft of theit own knowlcdg ? 8. A Man cannot fee by another's Eye, nor hear by another's Ear ; no more can a Man conclude or infer the thing to be refolv'd by another's Underftanding or Reafoning : and tho the Verdift be right the Jury give, yet... | |
 | Charles Lucas - 1751 - 690 str.
...according to the beft of their own Knowlege ? " A MAN can not fee by an other's Eye, nor hear by an other's Ear; no more can a Man conclude or infer the Thing to be refolved by an other's Underftanding or Reafoning; and though the Verdict be right, the Jury give,... | |
 | William Eden Baron Auckland - 1771 - 326 str.
...another " man, when fworn to do it, according to the " beft of their own knowledge ? A man cannot " fee by another's eye, nor hear by another's ear; " no more can a man conclude-, or infer the ft thing to be refohed by another's underjlanding " or reasoning; and though the verdict be " right,... | |
 | Joseph Towers - 1785 - 164 str.
...implicit acquiefcence in the opinion -of the judge. * A man * cannot fee,' fays fir John Vaughan, ' by * another's eye, nor hear by another's ear ; *...more can a man conclude, or infer * the thing to be refolved, by another's * underftanding or reafoning ; and though * the verdict be right the jury give,... | |
 | Charles Lucas - 1785 - 370 str.
...according to the beft of their own Knowlege ? " A MAN can not fee by an other's Eye, nor hear by an other'i Ear; no more can a Man conclude or infer the Thing to be refolved by an other's Underftanding or Reafoning; and though the Verdi£t be right, the Jury give,... | |
 | Earl Charles Stanhope Stanhope - 1792 - 178 str.
...be unknown to the Parties, and confe•' quently to the Court'* " A Man" (fays he -f-) " cannot fee by *' another's Eye, nor hear by another's Ear; "...more can a Man conclude or infer the " Thing to be refolved, by another's Under*• Jlanding or Reafoning. And though the •' VerdiA be right the Jury... | |
 | William Cobbett - 1811 - 844 str.
...the best of their own knowledge ? A man cannot set by another's eye, nor bear by another's •ar ; no more can a man conclude, or infer, the thing to...resolved by another's understanding, or reasoning ; unless .»U 737] men's understandings were equally alike. And if, merely, in compliance, becau?e... | |
 | James Wilson - 1804 - 514 str.
...pain of fines " and imprisonment, when sworn to do it according to the best of their own knowledge ? A man cannot see by another's eye, nor hear by another's...resolved, by another's understanding or reasoning. Upon all general issues, the jury find not the fact of every case by itself, leaving the law to the... | |
 | William Stephens Smith, Thomas Lloyd - 1807 - 340 str.
...to the best of their knowledge? A man cannot see by " another's eyes, nor hear by another's ears ; no more can a man *' conclude or infer the thing to be resolved by another's under" standing or meaning ; and though the verdict being right the «• jury give, yet, they not... | |
 | 1816 - 752 str.
...no crime for a jury to differ io opinion from the Court, where he says, That a man caunot see with another's eye, nor hear by another's ear ; no more can a man conclude or infer the thing by another's uaderstendMic or reasoning. From all which (1 insist) it № very plain, that the jury... | |
| |
A man cannot see by another's eye, nor hear by another's ear, no more can a man conclude or infer the thing to be resolved by another's understanding or reasoning... 
