An Amendment to the Constitution of the United States Authorizing Congress to Prohibit the Physical Desecration of the Flag of the United States: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, First Session, on S.J. Res. 14 ... April 20 and April 28, 1999, Svazek 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000 - Počet stran: 172 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 17
Strana 8
... applied in Smith would limit as well prosecutions brought under laws enacted pursuant to the proposed amendment . Nor is this a matter of purely hypothetical interest , unlikely to have much prac- tical import . The proposed amendment ...
... applied in Smith would limit as well prosecutions brought under laws enacted pursuant to the proposed amendment . Nor is this a matter of purely hypothetical interest , unlikely to have much prac- tical import . The proposed amendment ...
Strana 23
... applied . If the circumstances were ex- traordinary enough , all of these warnings might be overcome . Nor do we imagine that the Guidelines alone are capable of resolving all disputes about currently pend- ing proposals for ...
... applied . If the circumstances were ex- traordinary enough , all of these warnings might be overcome . Nor do we imagine that the Guidelines alone are capable of resolving all disputes about currently pend- ing proposals for ...
Strana 24
... applied in the context of some previous and pending proposals for constitutional amendment . It is significant that the Guidelines are written in the form of questions to think about , rather than commands to be obeyed . The Guide ...
... applied in the context of some previous and pending proposals for constitutional amendment . It is significant that the Guidelines are written in the form of questions to think about , rather than commands to be obeyed . The Guide ...
Strana 37
... applied only to one who " knowingly mutilates , defaces , physically defiles , burns , maintains on the ground , or tramples " a flag . Why would anyone presume that , under the pro- posed constitutional amendment , Congress would be ...
... applied only to one who " knowingly mutilates , defaces , physically defiles , burns , maintains on the ground , or tramples " a flag . Why would anyone presume that , under the pro- posed constitutional amendment , Congress would be ...
Strana 85
... applied through the processes of popular government , no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present , unless the in- cidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full ...
... applied through the processes of popular government , no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present , unless the in- cidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
amend the Constitution amendment process amendment's American flag American Legion argument asked believe Bill of Rights BRADY burn the flag burned an American burning a flag Chairman citizens Citizens Flag Alliance committee Congress congressional constitutional amendment criminal debate decision democratic dissent Eichman enacted expression federal flag amendment flag burning flag desecration flag desecration amendment Flag Protection Act Flag Protection Amendment free speech freedom of speech guidelines hearing important issue Johnson Justice legislation liberty limit majority means Medal of Honor ment Mike Christian Moss offensive PARKER patriotism physical desecration police political PREPARED STATEMENT proposed amendment proposed flag protect the flag question ratified respect response Reverend WILSON S.J. Res sacred Senator FEINGOLD Senator Kerrey Senator LEAHY served statute Supreme Court symbol testify Texas Thank tion U.S. flag U.S. SENATOR United values vandalism veterans Vietnam vote
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 86 - To courageous, self-reliant men, with confidence in the power of free and fearless reasoning applied through the processes of popular government, no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present, unless the incidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion.
Strana 85 - If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.
Strana 145 - If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.
Strana 10 - The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.
Strana 60 - And it came to pass, as soon as he came nigh unto the camp, that he saw the calf, and the dancing : and Moses' anger waxed hot, and he cast the tables out of his hands, and brake them beneath the mount.
Strana 144 - Accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.
Strana 137 - But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order.
Strana 117 - Constitution, independent tribunals of justice will consider themselves in a peculiar manner the guardians of those rights ; they will be an impenetrable bulwark against every assumption of power in the Legislative or Executive ; they will be naturally led to resist every encroachment upon rights expressly stipulated for in the Constitution by the declaration of rights.
Strana 142 - These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.* As we said in Noto v.
Strana 126 - States. 1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 2 of the United States of America in...