SOLICITOR-Continued. 11. Services in Exchequer Court of Canada-Agreement with client meruit-Evidence: O'Connor v. Gemmill, 12; 29 O. R. 47. 12. Settlement of action behind the back of plaintiff's solicitor- Rideout v. McLeod, 6 Brit. Col. L. R. 161. See Advocate-Affidavit-Bankruptcy and Insolvency, 20- See Contract, 17-Judgment, 13-Street Railways, 1-Vendor SPEEDY TRIAL. See Criminal Law, 24, 29. SPLITTING DEMAND. See Prohibition, 11. STAMPS. See Law Stamps. STATED CASE. See Appeal, 52-Arbitration and Award, 3-Indian-Parlia- STATEMENT OF CLAIM. i See Pleading, 11, 12. STATEMENT OF DEFENCE. See Pleading, 6, 13-18. STATUTE OF ELIZABETH. See Bankruptcy and Insolvency, 9, 13, 17, 18-Particulars, 2. STATUTE OF FRAUDS. See Bailment-Bankruptcy and Insolvency, 2-Contract, 18— STATUTES. 1. Amendment-Coal Mines Regulation Act, B.C., s. 4-Prohibi- Reg. v. Little, 6 Brit. Col. L. R. 78. 2. Amendment-Incorporation, by reference, of one statute in McKenzie v. Jackson, 31 N. S. Reps. 70. 3. Amendment-Retroactive effect-Limitation of actions-54 V. In re Roden and City of Toronto, 54; 25 A. R. 12. 4. British Columbia Game Protection Acts-Prohibition against Reg. v. Strauss, 5 Brit. Col. L. R. 486. 5. Division of sections into sub-sections-Effect of-Packing of Washington v. Grand Trunk R. W. Co., 125; 28 S. C. R. 184. 6. Effect of statute on pending action-Right of appeal-Separa- 7. Imperative or directory-Drainage Act, 1894, s. 93, s.-s. 3: VOL XVIII C L.T. TU STATUTES-Continued. 8. Imperative or directory-" May "-Performance of judicial act Fenson v. City of New Westminster, 5 Brit. Col. L. R. 624. 9. Limitation of right of appeal-Application to pending cases: 10. Ontario Insurance Act-Construction-Enabling statute: 11. Ontario Insurance Act-Retroactivity-Life insurance: 12. Retroactivity-Provision for registration of alimony decree- Foulds v. Foulds, 384. 13. Retroactivity-Right of appeal affected-Procedure: Koksilah Quarry Co. v. The Queen, 5 Brit. Col. L. R. 600. 14. Retroactivity-Solicitor-Practising without certificate-Bills Gourley v. McAloney, 29 N. S. Reps. 319. 15. Singular read as plural-" Preceding section' - Mines Act, Attorney-General v. Temple, 29 N. S. Reps. 279. 16. Repeal-Special Ordinance, N. W. T.-General Ordinance: 17. R. S. O. 1887 c. 194, s. 4-" Sale or other disposal "-Gift of Reg. v. Walsh, 10; 29 O. R. 36. See Appeal, 47-Game. STATUTORY DECLARATION. See Criminal Law, 20. STAY OF PROCEEDINGS. Discretion of Judge at Chambers-Mortgage action-Sale under to be ascertained: Auchterlony v. Palgrave Gold Mining Co., 29 N. S. Reps. See County Courts, 4. STIFLING PROSECUTION. See Contract, 2, 19-Duress, 2. STIPENDIARY MAGISTRATE. See Canada Temperance Act, 3-Liquor License Act, 3-Sum- STOCK EXCHANGE. See Principal and Agent, 2. STOCK JOBBING. See Principal and Agent, 2. STREAM. See Water and Watercourses. STREET RAILWAYS. 1. Contract-Running cars-Specific performance--Injunction—- Mandamus-Declaration: City of Kingston v. Kingston, etc., Electric R. W. Co., 397. 2. Ejection of passenger-Misconduct-Placing foot on cushion- Davis v. Ottawa Electric R. W. Co., 17 Occ. N. 168; 28 3. Footboard on side of car-Invitation to stand on-Improper Fraser v. London Street R. W. Co., 259; 29 O. R. 411. 4. Negligence-Injury to pedestrian-Infirm person-Evidence: See Assessment and Taxes, 11-Company, 10-Damages, 4- 1. Allowance of costs-Excess of jurisdiction-Criminal Code, s. SUMMARY CONVICTION—Continued. 2. Fine-Imprisonment in default of payment-No attempt to en- Reg. v. Petersky, 5 Brit. Col. L. R. 549. 3. Liquor License Act-Third offence against-Form of convic- - ment of summons in absence of defendant — Quashing Reg. v. Grant, 30 N. S. Reps. 368. 4. Motion to quash- Right of Court to look at evidence where Reg. v. Hughes, 106; 29 O. R. 179. 5. Penalty Adjudication of payment instead of forfeiture: Reg. v. Crowell, 29. 6. Removal by certiorari-Erroneous finding of fact by magistrate Reg. v. Walsh, 29 N. S. Reps. 521. 7. Rule nisi to quash-Death of prosecutor-Effect of: 8. Using abusive language—Jurisdiction of single justice-Motion Reg. v. McLeod, 30 N. S. Reps. 191. 9. Variance from information-Clerical error-Quashing convic- Reg. v. Dibblee-Ex p. Kavanagh, 34 N. B. Reps. 1. 10. Wilfully killing a dog-Penalty-Imprisonment in default-- Reg. v. Horton, 27. See Canada Temperance Act-Certiorari, 1, 2, 4, 5-Costs, 17, SUMMARY JUDGMENT. See Judgment, 14-18-Pleading, 13. SUMMARY ORDER. See Costs, 39. SUMMARY TRIAL. See Police Magistrate, 2. |